Income Inequality

island1fox

Well-Known Member
Sixth year and counting of Obamaville and the low informations still blame Bush.
I would love to see either a Business Agent or a Division mgr continue to blame someone six years before them.

Then again they are not the most powerful man in the world.

Life is tough --- life is even tougher for the stupid low informed!
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
Sixth year and counting of Obamaville and the low informations still blame Bush.
I would love to see either a Business Agent or a Division mgr continue to blame someone six years before them.

Then again they are not the most powerful man in the world.

Life is tough --- life is even tougher for the stupid low informed!

And you are still the defender of the worst president since herbert hoover.... i guess being part of the geriatric low information crowd is still popular in your parts.

TOS.
 

island1fox

Well-Known Member
And you are still the defender of the worst president since herbert hoover.... i guess being part of the geriatric low information crowd is still popular in your parts.

TOS.
Congratulations tos. Liberals eventually do become grown-ups ---you now have identified the worst President --the only 'present' one we have as being the worst --Barack Hussein Obama !!

The one who in his SIXTH year is going to re-focus-refocus-re-focus-re-focus re-focus-re-focus on those "shovel ready" jobs !!
 

island1fox

Well-Known Member
For the simple --low information voter :

Being comfortable and working for your financial security and you want to keep the money you earn is NOT greed.

Being not informed nor educated of able mind and body while wanting to take money from someone who has earned it , however is !!!:greedy:
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
Congratulations tos. Liberals eventually do become grown-ups ---you now have identified the worst President --the only 'present' one we have as being the worst --Barack Hussein Obama !!

The one who in his SIXTH year is going to re-focus-refocus-re-focus-re-focus re-focus-re-focus on those "shovel ready" jobs !!


There is a difference between grownups and relics. I think we each know who is who.

TOS
 

Catatonic

Nine Lives
Really? If you are going to make up something, do better than island:
Nice graph but mine tells a better story:
Graph labor.gif
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
For the simple --low information voter :

Being comfortable and working for your financial security and you want to keep the money you earn is NOT greed.

Being not informed nor educated of able mind and body while wanting to take money from someone who has earned it , however is !!!:greedy:


Can you do anything for yourself? Must you repeat Rush Limbaugh everyday on this board? Are you so brainwashed that you can only accept the theories provided to you by this over paid drug addict?

Yet, you claim to be the one who is "informed"..

Please.

TOS
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
Nice graph but mine tells a better story:
View attachment 10982


Your graph says nothing about what its suppose to represent. Lets see.. under Clinton, he takes Reagan/Bush's 7.1% unemployment rate to a flat 4%, and you claim he did this by losing more factories than BUSH. Of course, we know in planet reality that you are full of baloney.

Then, Your hero, GW BUSH, takes Clintons flat 4% unemployment and takes that to 7.8% in 8 years and given the first year of the obama administration, it was Bush's recession that was still costing jobs, that rate climbed to 10.7%.

Somehow, your engineering skills need some re-tooling.

Better think this one out a little better bro.

TOS.
 

brett636

Well-Known Member
Income and wealth "inequality" is a fictitious problem invented by people who either lack the drive or the ethic to earn a good living for themselves. Its never suggested that those lacking in income or wealth be raised up, but rather the richest among us torn down. What is conveniently ignored by these malcontents is that there is a natural inequality between each of us. Some of us are more capable than others, and in the world of free market capitalism that translates into some people earning and having more than others.
 

Catatonic

Nine Lives
Your graph says nothing about what its suppose to represent. Lets see.. under Clinton, he takes Reagan/Bush's 7.1% unemployment rate to a flat 4%, and you claim he did this by losing more factories than BUSH. Of course, we know in planet reality that you are full of baloney.

Then, Your hero, GW BUSH, takes Clintons flat 4% unemployment and takes that to 7.8% in 8 years and given the first year of the obama administration, it was Bush's recession that was still costing jobs, that rate climbed to 10.7%.

Somehow, your engineering skills need some re-tooling.

Better think this one out a little better bro.

TOS.
Swooooosh!

The point of my graph was to present something out of context with no backup data or sourcing.

I even gave a hint - "
Nice graph but mine tells a better story"

Thanks for the laugh ... I'm feeling pretty smug right now.

AND BTW, Bush Jr was not my hero.
I did not like his Socialist programs and I thought he was the most Socialist president since LBJ.

He is looking better in light of his successor.
 

island1fox

Well-Known Member
B
Income and wealth "inequality" is a fictitious problem invented by people who either lack the drive or the ethic to earn a good living for themselves. Its never suggested that those lacking in income or wealth be raised up, but rather the richest among us torn down. What is conveniently ignored by these malcontents is that there is a natural inequality between each of us. Some of us are more capable than others, and in the world of free market capitalism that translates into some people earning and having more than others.

brett,

Right on Target. Even Richard Sherman and tos claim to be the best ---all class .
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
Income and wealth "inequality" is a fictitious problem invented by people who either lack the drive or the ethic to earn a good living for themselves. Its never suggested that those lacking in income or wealth be raised up, but rather the richest among us torn down. What is conveniently ignored by these malcontents is that there is a natural inequality between each of us. Some of us are more capable than others, and in the world of free market capitalism that translates into some people earning and having more than others.
The US is hardly a bastion of "free" markets. Nothing more than a corporate oligarchy.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
I

see wkmac's influence on you.
Partially. Now tell me how we convince the oligarchs to give up that power and move to free markets. Wk insists that some day they will simply come to that conclusion on their own. (Yes, that's over simplification.)
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
bbsam,

So he should make more money than the rest !! Income inequality.
You made Brett's point very clear !!

Or do you believe that all football players should make the same ???
What he should make on any given team is probably artificially stunted by the salary cap. You don't see football players making baseball player money do you?
 
Top