Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Income Inequality
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="island1fox" data-source="post: 1270293" data-attributes="member: 4816"><p>rr,</p><p> </p><p>Read your OWN words ---lost hours translated to lost jobs.</p><p> </p><p>How can anyone deny --The Affordable Care Act --Clearly defined the Employers that would be Mandated to Provide Healthcare ---those with over 50 full time employees.</p><p> </p><p>The act went further and defined how many hours are worked are now legally defined as full or part time.</p><p> </p><p>When Pelosi got it passed --so the Employers --among others --could see the disaster of what is in it --the Employer mandate was moved back ---and now MANY many Employers are converting from full time jobs to part time jobs.</p><p> </p><p>Obama can claim -there are jobs being created --less people unemployed --more part time jobs --more dependent people.</p><p> </p><p>An Employer with 51 employees --plus --has been given the time --to hire and train 51 more employees --while lowering the hours of present full time employees --at the same time dropping the healthcare benefits on the original 51 employees.</p><p> </p><p>The Affordable care act was obviously composed by Rocket scientists.</p><p> </p><p>Just like --For Obamacare to succeed --we need the young and healthy to sign up ---then the affordable care act --leaves them on their parents policy till 26 --and puts the pre-existing condition clause in ??</p><p> </p><p>Definitely limits the number of young that will sign up immediately --they will sign up at 27 and only if they are sick !! Makes sense ???</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="island1fox, post: 1270293, member: 4816"] rr, Read your OWN words ---lost hours translated to lost jobs. How can anyone deny --The Affordable Care Act --Clearly defined the Employers that would be Mandated to Provide Healthcare ---those with over 50 full time employees. The act went further and defined how many hours are worked are now legally defined as full or part time. When Pelosi got it passed --so the Employers --among others --could see the disaster of what is in it --the Employer mandate was moved back ---and now MANY many Employers are converting from full time jobs to part time jobs. Obama can claim -there are jobs being created --less people unemployed --more part time jobs --more dependent people. An Employer with 51 employees --plus --has been given the time --to hire and train 51 more employees --while lowering the hours of present full time employees --at the same time dropping the healthcare benefits on the original 51 employees. The Affordable care act was obviously composed by Rocket scientists. Just like --For Obamacare to succeed --we need the young and healthy to sign up ---then the affordable care act --leaves them on their parents policy till 26 --and puts the pre-existing condition clause in ?? Definitely limits the number of young that will sign up immediately --they will sign up at 27 and only if they are sick !! Makes sense ??? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Income Inequality
Top