Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Investors Business Daily Opinion Piece on Obama
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="diesel96" data-source="post: 377831" data-attributes="member: 9859"><p>NO...I beg to differ. This link can define it better than I.</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.cesj.org/thirdway/economicjustice-defined.htm" target="_blank">http://www.cesj.org/thirdway/economicjustice-defined.htm</a></p><p> </p><p>You see it all ties together....Economic justice links with social justice, distiguishing justice from charity, and how participation, distribution (input-output) results into harmony.</p><p> </p><p> Quote to achieve "Economic Harmony"</p><p> </p><p>"interest of one man or group of men, if given free play, will produce results offering the maximum advantage to other men and the community as a whole." This principle offers guidelines for controlling monopolies, building checks-and-balances within social institutions, and re-synchronizing distribution (outtake) with participation (input). The first two principles of economic justice flow from the eternal human search for justice in general, which automatically requires a balance between input and outtake, i.e., "to each according to what he is due." The principle of harmony, on the other hand, reflects the human quest for other absolute values, including Truth, Love and Beauty.</p><p> </p><p>Punishing the successful, and taxing the rich? This is where we have fundamental differences. The rich and successful have been enjoying privledged tax cuts implemented by Bush to stimulate our economy and labor, meanwhile our Gov't spends uncontrollaby and big business is distributing jobs, goods and services overseas not fully participating in recycling back to our economy to achieve harmony. Thanks to the path this Gov't chose to follow, the rich and successful don't deserve this priviledge plus we can't afford to subsudize it, so what you consider taxing the rich and successful is simply a ROLLBACK on their taxes. If we give-ith....we can take it away-ith. And invest that revenue in our infrastructure, security and well-being (healthcare) of our citizens. Infrastructure is key in re-energizing our economic outlook.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="diesel96, post: 377831, member: 9859"] NO...I beg to differ. This link can define it better than I. [URL]http://www.cesj.org/thirdway/economicjustice-defined.htm[/URL] You see it all ties together....Economic justice links with social justice, distiguishing justice from charity, and how participation, distribution (input-output) results into harmony. Quote to achieve "Economic Harmony" "interest of one man or group of men, if given free play, will produce results offering the maximum advantage to other men and the community as a whole." This principle offers guidelines for controlling monopolies, building checks-and-balances within social institutions, and re-synchronizing distribution (outtake) with participation (input). The first two principles of economic justice flow from the eternal human search for justice in general, which automatically requires a balance between input and outtake, i.e., "to each according to what he is due." The principle of harmony, on the other hand, reflects the human quest for other absolute values, including Truth, Love and Beauty. Punishing the successful, and taxing the rich? This is where we have fundamental differences. The rich and successful have been enjoying privledged tax cuts implemented by Bush to stimulate our economy and labor, meanwhile our Gov't spends uncontrollaby and big business is distributing jobs, goods and services overseas not fully participating in recycling back to our economy to achieve harmony. Thanks to the path this Gov't chose to follow, the rich and successful don't deserve this priviledge plus we can't afford to subsudize it, so what you consider taxing the rich and successful is simply a ROLLBACK on their taxes. If we give-ith....we can take it away-ith. And invest that revenue in our infrastructure, security and well-being (healthcare) of our citizens. Infrastructure is key in re-energizing our economic outlook. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Investors Business Daily Opinion Piece on Obama
Top