Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Retirement Topics
Is Central States pension fund ready to go under?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nospinzone" data-source="post: 197806" data-attributes="member: 1335"><p><strong>Re: Working Without a Contract???</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Jon,</p><p>I would like to point out that you are misinformed and drawing an incorrect conclusion to the protection that employees have during contract negotiations. As I have described in <a href="http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/is-central-states-pension-fund-ready-to-go-under.69833/" target="_blank"><span style="color: Red">previous posts</span></a>, employers must maintain the <em>STATUS QUO</em> established in the previous contract while negotiating a new contract. Hence, employees do have the protection of a "contract" although technically it has expired. In my previous post, I referenced a case in which the <em>STATUS QUO </em>was enforced by the NLRB in a US Postal workers case. To give you a more succinct and clear definition of this protection, here is an excerpt from a 2004 case in which the long standing Supreme Court precedent of <em>STATUS QUO </em>is explained.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you or Krash have cases which would invalidate <em>STATUS QUO </em>in our situation, please provide them.</p><p></p><p>Whether this is intentional or not, please stop scaring people with the idea that they will lose all working rights and benefits during negotiations with the APWA. Their villages will not be pillaged. Their women and children will not be raped.</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/cool.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" data-shortname=":cool:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nospinzone, post: 197806, member: 1335"] [B]Re: Working Without a Contract???[/B] Jon, I would like to point out that you are misinformed and drawing an incorrect conclusion to the protection that employees have during contract negotiations. As I have described in [URL='http://www.browncafe.com/community/threads/is-central-states-pension-fund-ready-to-go-under.69833/'][COLOR=Red]previous posts[/COLOR][/URL], employers must maintain the [I]STATUS QUO[/I] established in the previous contract while negotiating a new contract. Hence, employees do have the protection of a "contract" although technically it has expired. In my previous post, I referenced a case in which the [I]STATUS QUO [/I]was enforced by the NLRB in a US Postal workers case. To give you a more succinct and clear definition of this protection, here is an excerpt from a 2004 case in which the long standing Supreme Court precedent of [I]STATUS QUO [/I]is explained. If you or Krash have cases which would invalidate [I]STATUS QUO [/I]in our situation, please provide them. Whether this is intentional or not, please stop scaring people with the idea that they will lose all working rights and benefits during negotiations with the APWA. Their villages will not be pillaged. Their women and children will not be raped. :cool: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Retirement Topics
Is Central States pension fund ready to go under?
Top