Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Israeli Invasion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="av8torntn" data-source="post: 464811" data-attributes="member: 8259"><p>I was talking about this article. I think most people understand the primary reason to DX the Israel strike on Iran was because we were already doing something about it. We as a nation have a tendency to try non military solutions to problems first. It seems time after time the NY Times seems to think it is their responsibility to print articles on covert operations. In my opinion even if the average Joe can put two and two together and figure out that we have people listening to phone calls of terrorists, or tracking money of terrorist organizations, or have prisons in undisclosed locations, or happen to be trying to sabotage or slow Iran's nuclear ambitions there is no positive reason for this to be published. I feel like it possibly puts peoples lives in danger and also reduces the chances of success in our nations war on terrorism. There was also one public time the government asked the Times to not publish information about our fight and the Times did it anyhow. When the Times printed it anyhow if I remember correctly the result was several nations stopped helping us track the money. </p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/washington/11iran.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1&sq=Israel%20Iran&st=%20cse&scp=1" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/washington/11iran.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1&sq=Israel Iran&st= cse&scp=1</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="av8torntn, post: 464811, member: 8259"] I was talking about this article. I think most people understand the primary reason to DX the Israel strike on Iran was because we were already doing something about it. We as a nation have a tendency to try non military solutions to problems first. It seems time after time the NY Times seems to think it is their responsibility to print articles on covert operations. In my opinion even if the average Joe can put two and two together and figure out that we have people listening to phone calls of terrorists, or tracking money of terrorist organizations, or have prisons in undisclosed locations, or happen to be trying to sabotage or slow Iran's nuclear ambitions there is no positive reason for this to be published. I feel like it possibly puts peoples lives in danger and also reduces the chances of success in our nations war on terrorism. There was also one public time the government asked the Times to not publish information about our fight and the Times did it anyhow. When the Times printed it anyhow if I remember correctly the result was several nations stopped helping us track the money. [url]http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/washington/11iran.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1&sq=Israel%20Iran&st=%20cse&scp=1[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Israeli Invasion
Top