Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Jonfrum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bill" data-source="post: 229935" data-attributes="member: 5483"><p>It all just came together who the real JON FRON is. At first, Jon reported a lawsuit that described the effects on being in a multi-pension fund. He was insinuating that we would all be better off if we were to exit the CS pension fund. He didn't want the Teamsters to control the pension fund. He appeared to be on the side of the APWA. Then he decided to switch sides and put down everything that the APWA people were writing. He didn't want the APWA to replace the Teamsters, because if they did, then the APWA would control the pension and health benefits. Here's where it all fits in. This week, UPS and CS reached a tentative agreement on withdrawing from the CS pension and health funds. (Who knows if other pension funds around the country will follow this trend.) Anyway, if this occurs UPS will have control of our pensions, and the Teamsters will be left with no control over anything. UPS will do anything they desire at this point. We have to choose between the lesser of two evils. The Teamsters and CS controlling the pension is doomed for bankruptcy in approximately 7-8 years. With UPS controlling the pension, it is more secure, but we will never see an increase over the set amount ($3000 per month), even as the cost of living goes up and our pensions are worth less each year. UPS will end up saving billions of dollars down the road. The best scenario would be to have an independent union that controls our pensions and benefits (APWA). Anyway, back to Jon Fron. Jon must be in management, because his posts, and the situation that is playing out is exactly what he wants, and coincidently, this is the same deal that would benefit UPS management the most. In summation, JON and UPS management want to control the pension, and keep the Teamsters as our bargaining agent as they will have virtually no power under this scenario I have described. Therefore, logically, Jon must be in UPS management.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bill, post: 229935, member: 5483"] It all just came together who the real JON FRON is. At first, Jon reported a lawsuit that described the effects on being in a multi-pension fund. He was insinuating that we would all be better off if we were to exit the CS pension fund. He didn't want the Teamsters to control the pension fund. He appeared to be on the side of the APWA. Then he decided to switch sides and put down everything that the APWA people were writing. He didn't want the APWA to replace the Teamsters, because if they did, then the APWA would control the pension and health benefits. Here's where it all fits in. This week, UPS and CS reached a tentative agreement on withdrawing from the CS pension and health funds. (Who knows if other pension funds around the country will follow this trend.) Anyway, if this occurs UPS will have control of our pensions, and the Teamsters will be left with no control over anything. UPS will do anything they desire at this point. We have to choose between the lesser of two evils. The Teamsters and CS controlling the pension is doomed for bankruptcy in approximately 7-8 years. With UPS controlling the pension, it is more secure, but we will never see an increase over the set amount ($3000 per month), even as the cost of living goes up and our pensions are worth less each year. UPS will end up saving billions of dollars down the road. The best scenario would be to have an independent union that controls our pensions and benefits (APWA). Anyway, back to Jon Fron. Jon must be in management, because his posts, and the situation that is playing out is exactly what he wants, and coincidently, this is the same deal that would benefit UPS management the most. In summation, JON and UPS management want to control the pension, and keep the Teamsters as our bargaining agent as they will have virtually no power under this scenario I have described. Therefore, logically, Jon must be in UPS management. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Jonfrum
Top