Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Judge Napolitano Ask What If......
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 884842" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>The problem with the judge and the constitution, is he is only on the side of the constitution when the democrats are in office, and when the republicans are in office, he looks the other way.</p><p></p><p>In KELO, he said it best, when it comes to property, the goverment can take it, the only issue then becomes what value does it have, and the owner of the property will have to go to court to establish a value for the property, and that value has to be set by the goverment.</p><p></p><p>In other words, he sides with goverment in the taking of peoples property ( as the king did in england) and the person owning the land would have NO SAY. The goverment would then seize the property and begin using the land for whatever purpose while the owner of the land is forced to sue the goverment in order to be compensated.</p><p></p><p>How does this reconcile with his positions of "smaller goverment", or "goverment intrusion" or "goverment being able to take from it citizens"?</p><p></p><p>This buffoon will say whatever FOXED SPEWS tells him to say.</p><p></p><p>Peace.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 884842, member: 17969"] The problem with the judge and the constitution, is he is only on the side of the constitution when the democrats are in office, and when the republicans are in office, he looks the other way. In KELO, he said it best, when it comes to property, the goverment can take it, the only issue then becomes what value does it have, and the owner of the property will have to go to court to establish a value for the property, and that value has to be set by the goverment. In other words, he sides with goverment in the taking of peoples property ( as the king did in england) and the person owning the land would have NO SAY. The goverment would then seize the property and begin using the land for whatever purpose while the owner of the land is forced to sue the goverment in order to be compensated. How does this reconcile with his positions of "smaller goverment", or "goverment intrusion" or "goverment being able to take from it citizens"? This buffoon will say whatever FOXED SPEWS tells him to say. Peace. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Judge Napolitano Ask What If......
Top