Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Kagan hearings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Babagounj" data-source="post: 750642" data-attributes="member: 12952"><p>She admitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee that as a Clinton lawyer, she falsified a document and the confirmation hearings are still proceeding? It seems to me that this admission should automatically disqualify her as a nominee!!!</p><p> </p><p> <span style="font-family: 'times new roman'"><span style="font-size: 10px">Elena Kagan has now admitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee that as a Clinton lawyer in 1997, she fraudulently revised </span></span><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/30/kagan-defends-revising-medical-groups-statement-partial-birth-abortion/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'"><span style="font-size: 10px">an official medical opinion by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</span></span></span></a><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'"><span style="font-size: 10px">. The medical society was going to publicly reveal that “its panel of experts found no circumstances in which the (partial birth abortion) procedure was the only option for saving the life of the woman.”</span></span></p><p><em><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-size: 15px"><em> <span style="font-family: 'times new roman'"><span style="font-size: 10px">In a secret internal memo, she wrote that “This, of course, would be a disaster[.]” </span></span> </em></span></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-size: 15px"><em> <span style="font-family: 'times new roman'"><span style="font-size: 10px">Kagan therefore secretly revised the language so the final statement in 1997 claimed that the partial-birth abortion “may be the best and most appropriate procedure in particular circumstances to save the life or preserve the health of the woman.”</span></span> </em></span></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-size: 15px"><em> <span style="font-family: 'times new roman'"><span style="font-size: 10px">That was a pernicious lie. The medical panel originally said that was false. Kagan substituted her own judgment for a medical consensus. </span></span> </em></span></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-size: 15px"><em> <span style="font-family: 'times new roman'"><span style="font-size: 10px">No wonder eight hundred Jewish rabbis have publicly stated that in their opinion, Elena Kagan is not morally qualified to be on the Supreme Court. Her fraudulent actions in 1997 legally authorized the killing of approximately </span></span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_birth_abortion#.22Partial-birth_abortion.22" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff"><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'"><span style="font-size: 10px">two thousand newborns or almost-newborns</span></span></span></a><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'"><span style="font-size: 10px"> each year, according to the pro-abortion Gutmacher Institute. </span></span> </em></span></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></span></em></p><p><em><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></span></em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Babagounj, post: 750642, member: 12952"] She admitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee that as a Clinton lawyer, she falsified a document and the confirmation hearings are still proceeding? It seems to me that this admission should automatically disqualify her as a nominee!!! [FONT=times new roman][SIZE=2]Elena Kagan has now admitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee that as a Clinton lawyer in 1997, she fraudulently revised [/SIZE][/FONT][URL='http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/30/kagan-defends-revising-medical-groups-statement-partial-birth-abortion/'][COLOR=#0000ff][FONT=times new roman][SIZE=2]an official medical opinion by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists[/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/URL][FONT=times new roman][SIZE=2]. The medical society was going to publicly reveal that “its panel of experts found no circumstances in which the (partial birth abortion) procedure was the only option for saving the life of the woman.”[/SIZE][/FONT] [I][FONT=Verdana][SIZE=4][I] [FONT=times new roman][SIZE=2]In a secret internal memo, she wrote that “This, of course, would be a disaster[.]” [/SIZE][/FONT] [/I][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana][SIZE=4][I] [FONT=times new roman][SIZE=2]Kagan therefore secretly revised the language so the final statement in 1997 claimed that the partial-birth abortion “may be the best and most appropriate procedure in particular circumstances to save the life or preserve the health of the woman.”[/SIZE][/FONT] [/I][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana][SIZE=4][I] [FONT=times new roman][SIZE=2]That was a pernicious lie. The medical panel originally said that was false. Kagan substituted her own judgment for a medical consensus. [/SIZE][/FONT] [/I][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana][SIZE=4][I] [FONT=times new roman][SIZE=2]No wonder eight hundred Jewish rabbis have publicly stated that in their opinion, Elena Kagan is not morally qualified to be on the Supreme Court. Her fraudulent actions in 1997 legally authorized the killing of approximately [/SIZE][/FONT][URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_birth_abortion#.22Partial-birth_abortion.22'][COLOR=#0000ff][FONT=times new roman][SIZE=2]two thousand newborns or almost-newborns[/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/URL][FONT=times new roman][SIZE=2] each year, according to the pro-abortion Gutmacher Institute. [/SIZE][/FONT] [/I][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana][SIZE=4][I][/I] [I][/I][/SIZE][/FONT][/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Kagan hearings
Top