Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Layed off drivers being fired for mislaods
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="westsideworma" data-source="post: 591362"><p>Jon I believe different regions, districts and even different areas of a building have different numbers (at least in regards to PPH) but I'll tell you ours to at least start the comparisons.</p><p></p><p>The MAR for misloads its 1/1800 and PPH (boxline to car loading) is around 212PPH on average. </p><p></p><p>In my opinion going after someone having one as mentioned in this thread is pathetic. I think the real reason is he's a driver probably at top rate making $28+ an hour....</p><p></p><p>Obviously perfection is the goal, but 1 a week would put some of my loaders at about 1/5000+, a perfectly acceptable frequency. Thats 4 a month...not really that bad. </p><p></p><p>Some loaders avg. 2 a month, others 6, others much much more, but going after every one of them sends a message and for the most part not a good one. I understand what we're looking for but do I think documenting a guy that averages 2 a month is necessary when his frequency betters the goal 10 times over? absolutely not. We do though.</p><p></p><p>I would think to avoid service failures, preloaders whenever possible should be loading neighboring loops/routes (54A,B,C etc). I'm not saying that we should give up on misloads but this at least helps prevent some of them from not being delivered. Also we should not name them all 54/loop as some like 54E and friend start to look similar when you're moving as fast as preloaders need to with the time they're given. If some people don't think so, tell them to try it sometime (especially with the new magenta imprinter labels). We've used driver names and things got better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="westsideworma, post: 591362"] Jon I believe different regions, districts and even different areas of a building have different numbers (at least in regards to PPH) but I'll tell you ours to at least start the comparisons. The MAR for misloads its 1/1800 and PPH (boxline to car loading) is around 212PPH on average. In my opinion going after someone having one as mentioned in this thread is pathetic. I think the real reason is he's a driver probably at top rate making $28+ an hour.... Obviously perfection is the goal, but 1 a week would put some of my loaders at about 1/5000+, a perfectly acceptable frequency. Thats 4 a month...not really that bad. Some loaders avg. 2 a month, others 6, others much much more, but going after every one of them sends a message and for the most part not a good one. I understand what we're looking for but do I think documenting a guy that averages 2 a month is necessary when his frequency betters the goal 10 times over? absolutely not. We do though. I would think to avoid service failures, preloaders whenever possible should be loading neighboring loops/routes (54A,B,C etc). I'm not saying that we should give up on misloads but this at least helps prevent some of them from not being delivered. Also we should not name them all 54/loop as some like 54E and friend start to look similar when you're moving as fast as preloaders need to with the time they're given. If some people don't think so, tell them to try it sometime (especially with the new magenta imprinter labels). We've used driver names and things got better. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Layed off drivers being fired for mislaods
Top