Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Local 89 mailing to 9000 members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bubblehead" data-source="post: 1199440" data-attributes="member: 14176"><p>We haven't lost anybody, in regards to their employment, as a result of 17i (other serious offenses).</p><p>That being said, many of our members have lost many thou$and$ of dollars in lost wages due to a weak panel system and lack of fortitude by charged employees when the company throws their sheite against the wall to see if it sticks, knowing it wont.</p><p>Back pay is a myth in regards to 17i.</p><p>Return to work, discharge reduced to suspension, time served is the reality. </p><p>Cardinal?Serious?, it will make no difference in the world of UPS.</p><p>Your right, it's a silly, pile on, bogus charge that is interpreted loosely and it wont change until 17i is completely eliminated or specifically defined.</p><p>What idiot let it in the first place?</p><p></p><p>407, you liked Inthegame's above post.</p><p>How did it work out for you when you were discharged under this crap language?</p><p>How much money did it cost you?</p><p>Your agent is responsible and certainly not TDU, I man I respect very much.</p><p>Do you think changing it from serious to cardinal is really going to insulate you from the wrath of 17i at the Ohio Panel in the future?</p><p>I myself lost 9 days pay because of 17i for an infraction that clearly warranted nothing more than a warning letter, failure to follow instructions.</p><p>As a matter of fact, in the end, my discharge was reduced to a warning letter at the local level only when I agreed to release the company of any back pay liability.</p><p></p><p>So no Inthegame, it hasn't been "addressed to my satisfaction".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bubblehead, post: 1199440, member: 14176"] We haven't lost anybody, in regards to their employment, as a result of 17i (other serious offenses). That being said, many of our members have lost many thou$and$ of dollars in lost wages due to a weak panel system and lack of fortitude by charged employees when the company throws their sheite against the wall to see if it sticks, knowing it wont. Back pay is a myth in regards to 17i. Return to work, discharge reduced to suspension, time served is the reality. Cardinal?Serious?, it will make no difference in the world of UPS. Your right, it's a silly, pile on, bogus charge that is interpreted loosely and it wont change until 17i is completely eliminated or specifically defined. What idiot let it in the first place? 407, you liked Inthegame's above post. How did it work out for you when you were discharged under this crap language? How much money did it cost you? Your agent is responsible and certainly not TDU, I man I respect very much. Do you think changing it from serious to cardinal is really going to insulate you from the wrath of 17i at the Ohio Panel in the future? I myself lost 9 days pay because of 17i for an infraction that clearly warranted nothing more than a warning letter, failure to follow instructions. As a matter of fact, in the end, my discharge was reduced to a warning letter at the local level only when I agreed to release the company of any back pay liability. So no Inthegame, it hasn't been "addressed to my satisfaction". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Local 89 mailing to 9000 members
Top