RealPerson
Well-Known Member
Be nice to have a list, so we can show others who all is Voting NO, so people just don't think it is a few individuals.
Teamsters Local 89
Teamsters Local 89
Add local 89 to the small but hopefully growing list.So far, in local 396- southern california, we are a solid NO VOTE. Part timers are being informed everyday, feeder is on board, Package is unified. Of course, we have to those members who will do whatever the local tells them as long as there is a HAT, or JACKET given to them.
We are working everyday to inform our entire membership of the NO VOTE intention.
Peace
TOS
Right, TOS. But there can be a difference between what the members seem to want, and what the Local Union Executive Board recommends. So until Ron H announces his recommendation, you can't say that 396 is against the TA.
So how did it go from UNANIMOUS on May 7th in Washington DC to 4 locals (at present) recommending NO votes? That much changes in just 16 days?Based on posts here on browncafe, andbased on postes on the "Vote No o UP Contract" facebook page, https://www.facebook.com/groups/161346104027154/?fref=ts here is what I see so far:
Local officers recommending a YES vote on the national TA:
707
623
952
Local officers recommending a NO vote on the national TA:
89
384
804
30
So how did it go from UNANIMOUS on May 7th in Washington DC to 4 locals (at present) recommending NO votes? That much changes in just 16 days?
So how did it go from UNANIMOUS on May 7th in Washington DC to 4 locals (at present) recommending NO votes? That much changes in just 16 days?
Different audiences ... all Union officials are politicians.
I guess everyone who said yes but didn't really approve is a pusillanimous?So how did it go from UNANIMOUS on May 7th in Washington DC to 4 locals (at present) recommending NO votes? That much changes in just 16 days?
Hoax, still feel that this contract will pass with a large margin?
Not being smart, just wondering.
I guess everyone who said yes but didn't really approve is a pusillanimous?
It's always like this. People talk a tough game.Hoax, still feel that this contract will pass with a large margin?
Not being smart, just wondering.
Maybe but I'm willing to bet they were scared or they knew it was a good deal.Or maybe those who are a yes vote just want to suck Hall/Hoffa's brown hole.
Maybe but I'm willing to bet they were scared or they knew it was a good deal.