Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
LU 177 "selective" Seniority.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bubblehead" data-source="post: 2361632" data-attributes="member: 14176"><p>I haven't paid a whole lot of attention, but did offer up how it is dealt with in my Local.</p><p>As [USER=37112]@Inthegame[/USER] has alluded, it's a polarizing issue, where the players tend to line up where their bread is buttered.</p><p>In the end, with the company hiring 6-1 from inside, while sponsoring us in our licensing, I don't see how separating the classifications seniority-wise is fair.</p><p>Again, here in my Local, we keep our seniority as we pass between all full time classifications; packages, feeder, or 22.3.</p><p>I don't see where that is unfair?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bubblehead, post: 2361632, member: 14176"] I haven't paid a whole lot of attention, but did offer up how it is dealt with in my Local. As [USER=37112]@Inthegame[/USER] has alluded, it's a polarizing issue, where the players tend to line up where their bread is buttered. In the end, with the company hiring 6-1 from inside, while sponsoring us in our licensing, I don't see how separating the classifications seniority-wise is fair. Again, here in my Local, we keep our seniority as we pass between all full time classifications; packages, feeder, or 22.3. I don't see where that is unfair? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
LU 177 "selective" Seniority.
Top