Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
Mip Factor Announced
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cezanne" data-source="post: 130435" data-attributes="member: 5104"><p>These actions and rumors going about management's compensation can only provide information to the concerned employee about how the company is cutting cost to look good on wall street. Bottom line is the partner concept that most management has been brought up with is a thing of the past, or lip service at it's best. Upper management wants results so you lower types are expendable, expect more cuts in certain levels of management as far as pension, health and welfare and stock options. Wall street loves when companies put dedicated employees on the street to save costs, why should management be exempt from this kind of corporate thinking. The whole Jim Casey attitude about loyality and dedication is considered dated by most corporations in today's dog eat dog market place. Maybe corporate UPS has bought into this kind of thinking, beside with contract talks going on and the concentration on the pension and health and welfare issues with the union employees are they providing a more level playing field between the compensation of it's employees union and non-union. Afterall you have to admit that over the years management has enjoyed most of the perks with company service compared with their union counterparts. </p><p> </p><p>Can see the resentment that the younger manager and supervision workforce might have to their older and much more compensated partners. The prospect of the younger management employee ever obtaining the same perks with their years of service as their current bosses are dwindling. The discovery of how to use the part time supervisor positions and the non union OMS workforce who are in the short term and long term alot cheaper to maintain than the full time management employee might be coming into play here. What could be happening also is that everybody in management is scared of losing their positions and are starting to make decisions that justify their worth to the company, one big pecking order.</p><p> </p><p>Best of luck to our non union workforce<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/thumbup1.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":thumbup1:" title="Thumbup1 :thumbup1:" data-shortname=":thumbup1:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cezanne, post: 130435, member: 5104"] These actions and rumors going about management's compensation can only provide information to the concerned employee about how the company is cutting cost to look good on wall street. Bottom line is the partner concept that most management has been brought up with is a thing of the past, or lip service at it's best. Upper management wants results so you lower types are expendable, expect more cuts in certain levels of management as far as pension, health and welfare and stock options. Wall street loves when companies put dedicated employees on the street to save costs, why should management be exempt from this kind of corporate thinking. The whole Jim Casey attitude about loyality and dedication is considered dated by most corporations in today's dog eat dog market place. Maybe corporate UPS has bought into this kind of thinking, beside with contract talks going on and the concentration on the pension and health and welfare issues with the union employees are they providing a more level playing field between the compensation of it's employees union and non-union. Afterall you have to admit that over the years management has enjoyed most of the perks with company service compared with their union counterparts. Can see the resentment that the younger manager and supervision workforce might have to their older and much more compensated partners. The prospect of the younger management employee ever obtaining the same perks with their years of service as their current bosses are dwindling. The discovery of how to use the part time supervisor positions and the non union OMS workforce who are in the short term and long term alot cheaper to maintain than the full time management employee might be coming into play here. What could be happening also is that everybody in management is scared of losing their positions and are starting to make decisions that justify their worth to the company, one big pecking order. Best of luck to our non union workforce:thumbup1: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
Mip Factor Announced
Top