Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
miraculous free market: 5x more vacant homes than homeless people
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BrownArmy" data-source="post: 1550331" data-attributes="member: 18225"><p>They're owned by the banks, under false pretenses (most especially in low-rent districts, so to speak).</p><p></p><p>One of the LARGEST BAILOUTS in history went to the housing side of the banking industry, who PURPOSEFULLY LIED, AGAIN AND AGAIN, AND BASICALLY WALKED OFF SCOT-FREE.</p><p></p><p>I don't feel like I need to tell <strong><em>you</em></strong> this, but here goes: </p><p></p><p>Those homes shouldn't have been seized from the people in the first place, or to put it more clearly, those people shouldn't have had those homes in the first place, because they didn't qualify...</p><p></p><p>But, but, if they didn't qualify, how did they get those homes, you might ask.</p><p></p><p>BECAUSE THE SYSTEM WAS RIGGED.</p><p></p><p>Bankers made millions, the economy collapsed, people who shouldn't have been in homes lost their homes (clearly), but a lot of other 'innocent' consumers also ended up losing their homes in the fallout of what was basically the government giving the bankers a hand-job.</p><p></p><p>So, yes, these homes are owned by SOMEONE...most likely a bank, and in terms of no buyers, sometimes it makes 'economic' sense to populate said homes with people who will then go forth and propagate and spend money and pay taxes...etc.</p><p></p><p>--------</p><p></p><p>If you do some research, it actually makes economic sense to repopulate homeless people in vacant buildings.</p><p></p><p>You will call this 'SOCIALISM'.</p><p></p><p>A lot of the things you talk about I could easily describe as 'FASCISM'.</p><p> </p><p>(Such a fine line...)</p><p></p><p>Offer is still open, if you want to get that beer...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BrownArmy, post: 1550331, member: 18225"] They're owned by the banks, under false pretenses (most especially in low-rent districts, so to speak). One of the LARGEST BAILOUTS in history went to the housing side of the banking industry, who PURPOSEFULLY LIED, AGAIN AND AGAIN, AND BASICALLY WALKED OFF SCOT-FREE. I don't feel like I need to tell [B][I]you[/I][/B] this, but here goes: Those homes shouldn't have been seized from the people in the first place, or to put it more clearly, those people shouldn't have had those homes in the first place, because they didn't qualify... But, but, if they didn't qualify, how did they get those homes, you might ask. BECAUSE THE SYSTEM WAS RIGGED. Bankers made millions, the economy collapsed, people who shouldn't have been in homes lost their homes (clearly), but a lot of other 'innocent' consumers also ended up losing their homes in the fallout of what was basically the government giving the bankers a hand-job. So, yes, these homes are owned by SOMEONE...most likely a bank, and in terms of no buyers, sometimes it makes 'economic' sense to populate said homes with people who will then go forth and propagate and spend money and pay taxes...etc. -------- If you do some research, it actually makes economic sense to repopulate homeless people in vacant buildings. You will call this 'SOCIALISM'. A lot of the things you talk about I could easily describe as 'FASCISM'. (Such a fine line...) Offer is still open, if you want to get that beer... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
miraculous free market: 5x more vacant homes than homeless people
Top