Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
More I.E. stupidity!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 599442" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>In the case I quoted, the four hours spent on road by the TAW would <em>not</em> have correspondingly reduced 4 hours from the 60 other drivers...maybe it would have saved an hour or two....</p><p> </p><p>but this is irrelevant, since the TAW driver is going to get paid for 8 hours anyway, <em>whether he delivers a package or not.</em></p><p> </p><p>Any work done by a TAW should therefore be regarded as a "freebee". You will pay him the <em>same</em> amount of money for doing 0 stops as you will for doing 1, or 4, or 8, or 120 stops.</p><p> </p><p>The issue here is how that work is <em>coded</em>. If the work done by the TAW is input into a DIAD, it shows up as a "route" and drags down the center average SPORH due to the large amount of time spent delivering those 3 or 4 misloaded stops.</p><p> </p><p>My whole point is that any work done by a TAW...subject to reasonable limits of course... <em>should be coded in such a manner as to not influence the center SPORH one way or another.</em></p><p> </p><p>Or...we could quit busting our center managers balls over a .11 decrease in SPORH for one day so that he has the motivation and support to do the <em>right </em>thing for the customer instead of being forced to fearfully manipulate statistics in order to appease some IE goon who is ready to bury an axe in his back.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 599442, member: 14668"] In the case I quoted, the four hours spent on road by the TAW would [I]not[/I] have correspondingly reduced 4 hours from the 60 other drivers...maybe it would have saved an hour or two.... but this is irrelevant, since the TAW driver is going to get paid for 8 hours anyway, [I]whether he delivers a package or not.[/I] Any work done by a TAW should therefore be regarded as a "freebee". You will pay him the [I]same[/I] amount of money for doing 0 stops as you will for doing 1, or 4, or 8, or 120 stops. The issue here is how that work is [I]coded[/I]. If the work done by the TAW is input into a DIAD, it shows up as a "route" and drags down the center average SPORH due to the large amount of time spent delivering those 3 or 4 misloaded stops. My whole point is that any work done by a TAW...subject to reasonable limits of course... [I]should be coded in such a manner as to not influence the center SPORH one way or another.[/I] Or...we could quit busting our center managers balls over a .11 decrease in SPORH for one day so that he has the motivation and support to do the [I]right [/I]thing for the customer instead of being forced to fearfully manipulate statistics in order to appease some IE goon who is ready to bury an axe in his back. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
More I.E. stupidity!
Top