Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Myron Named to UPS Management Committee
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Myron" data-source="post: 458685" data-attributes="member: 5496"><p>Please Trick,</p><p> </p><p>I never stated I was, or soon to be discriminated against due to age. I have only stated what I have observed in two districts I am familiar with, the age demographics of dismissal (voluntary or forced), demotion and disability claims for management seem to point toward attrition of the older management more frequently than younger management. The practice of hiring and promotion of younger individuals to fill the roles left by older employees is skewed toward younger individuals. That my friend is a potential pattern of what age discrimination truly is.</p><p> </p><p>In the districts I am familiar with, 70% of UPS management workforce is over 40 and only 30% is under, therefore it would seem you would have relatively similar attrition numbers. My observations have shown that this is not the case. The attrition situation (demotion, termination, disability) is over triple for managment employees over 40 but not yet 55 versus managment that is under 40. That is all. I urge you to see for yourself in the location you are familiar with.</p><p> </p><p>It appears now that there is massive redundancy in the districts and functions that have consolidated in terms of management and other non-union.... It would be intriguing to know of the districts consolidated, what the resulting attrition rates of the people who are over 40 versus those younger. My wager is there are proportionately more people leaving or taking lesser roles in those consolidated districts who are over 40 than under forty relative to age demographic percentages. </p><p> </p><p>I want you to take shots at what I have written based on what see in your own district. Not for me, for you! If you don't accumulate data for yourself and still consider me a dissident then you truly either don't care about the company you work for, or perhaps the others you work with. I love them both.</p><p> </p><p>Do you think we lose money in lawsuits because we are doing the right thing always? Do you know Mike Clark in Iowa help to cost us MILLIONS because of what he was doing? Get a clue. You can call me an observer. Dissident doesn't fit correctly.</p><p> </p><p>Myron-Grey is my mother's maiden name. I would hope each of you would have enough common sense to realize Myron Gray wasn't my real name. Also, trplnkl, my oral pharnyx works just fine as does my larynx. LOL.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>A good partner is a smart partner....and hopefully not blind or too stubborn or lazy to look.</p><p> </p><p>Regards</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Myron, post: 458685, member: 5496"] Please Trick, I never stated I was, or soon to be discriminated against due to age. I have only stated what I have observed in two districts I am familiar with, the age demographics of dismissal (voluntary or forced), demotion and disability claims for management seem to point toward attrition of the older management more frequently than younger management. The practice of hiring and promotion of younger individuals to fill the roles left by older employees is skewed toward younger individuals. That my friend is a potential pattern of what age discrimination truly is. In the districts I am familiar with, 70% of UPS management workforce is over 40 and only 30% is under, therefore it would seem you would have relatively similar attrition numbers. My observations have shown that this is not the case. The attrition situation (demotion, termination, disability) is over triple for managment employees over 40 but not yet 55 versus managment that is under 40. That is all. I urge you to see for yourself in the location you are familiar with. It appears now that there is massive redundancy in the districts and functions that have consolidated in terms of management and other non-union.... It would be intriguing to know of the districts consolidated, what the resulting attrition rates of the people who are over 40 versus those younger. My wager is there are proportionately more people leaving or taking lesser roles in those consolidated districts who are over 40 than under forty relative to age demographic percentages. I want you to take shots at what I have written based on what see in your own district. Not for me, for you! If you don't accumulate data for yourself and still consider me a dissident then you truly either don't care about the company you work for, or perhaps the others you work with. I love them both. Do you think we lose money in lawsuits because we are doing the right thing always? Do you know Mike Clark in Iowa help to cost us MILLIONS because of what he was doing? Get a clue. You can call me an observer. Dissident doesn't fit correctly. Myron-Grey is my mother's maiden name. I would hope each of you would have enough common sense to realize Myron Gray wasn't my real name. Also, trplnkl, my oral pharnyx works just fine as does my larynx. LOL. A good partner is a smart partner....and hopefully not blind or too stubborn or lazy to look. Regards [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Myron Named to UPS Management Committee
Top