Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Negotiations Conference Call Update this Saturday, February 2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Inthegame" data-source="post: 1087881" data-attributes="member: 37112"><p>I'll ignore the insults and inanity (BofA dissertation?) and get to the meat of your post...that's if commentary is allowed on... wait for it...a forum that lives on commentary!!! </p><p>A Memo that clearly states, ***Please Distribute to <u>Shop Stewards</u>***, then TO: All Teamster UPS<u> Shop Stewards</u>,</p><p>then RE: <u>Shop Stewards </u>Negotiation Update Conference Call, followed by the body of text which reads... This call is to update Teamster UPS <u>Shop Stewards</u>... it is important that every <u>Shop Steward</u> participate...and finally ***Please Distribute to <u>Shop Stewards</u>*** and you have reasonably concluded the IBT's intent was to share this with all work groups?</p><p>The contract update information should absolutely be shared with work groups <strong>after the call</strong> and delineating this info through stewards is a very viable format to accomplish that goal. Having a wide open format will end any meaningful Q&A. </p><p>The "propitiatory information" jab was having a little fun. Relax Bagels I think we're on the same side.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Inthegame, post: 1087881, member: 37112"] I'll ignore the insults and inanity (BofA dissertation?) and get to the meat of your post...that's if commentary is allowed on... wait for it...a forum that lives on commentary!!! A Memo that clearly states, ***Please Distribute to [U]Shop Stewards[/U]***, then TO: All Teamster UPS[U] Shop Stewards[/U], then RE: [U]Shop Stewards [/U]Negotiation Update Conference Call, followed by the body of text which reads... This call is to update Teamster UPS [U]Shop Stewards[/U]... it is important that every [U]Shop Steward[/U] participate...and finally ***Please Distribute to [U]Shop Stewards[/U]*** and you have reasonably concluded the IBT's intent was to share this with all work groups? The contract update information should absolutely be shared with work groups [B]after the call[/B] and delineating this info through stewards is a very viable format to accomplish that goal. Having a wide open format will end any meaningful Q&A. The "propitiatory information" jab was having a little fun. Relax Bagels I think we're on the same side. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Negotiations Conference Call Update this Saturday, February 2
Top