Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
OBAMA gets another high profile Terror suspect! Who's tough on terror now?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 885058" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>As for Napolitano on killing in this fashion and pay attention as he also names Bush in this too. </p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]N3xf56nWU0E[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>As to Saddam Hussein, yeah, I understand what you are saying and if people fully understood how he came to power with the aid of American CIA and other related interests, it might make this an even bigger story. We didn't find any WMD because it had "made in US" or "made by NATO member nation" stamped on the side and to find that would have ripped the veil off the curtain rod. And let's not forget the Saudi relationship in all of this either. </p><p></p><p>What began this whole dark history was to protect the Saudi royals and their kingdom in the first place. It also didn't help that Saddam in 1999' toyed with violating "the law" that all oil transacted globally would be sold in dollars and instead tired to undermine the US by creating an oil market trading oil for Euros. </p><p></p><p>Funny, that the 4 nations having challenged the dominance of the dollar, those being Iraq, Iran, Venezuela and Libya, 2 have new leaders and govt's, 1 experienced a covert US backed coup attempt and the last is painted the pariah of the world. Change all these nationstates to some corp. name and everyone would see the naked business actions for exactly what they are. Hostile Corp. takeovers. Or takedowns!</p><p></p><p>Would we tolerate our firstborn going to war so that one corp. could take out another corp.? Would we sacrifice our own lives literally so UPS could takeout FedEx? Would we send our children to do it? If you want to understand the modern nature of war, go to Netflix and watch the Daniel Ellsberg documentary <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20150320153931/http://www.mostdangerousman.org/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000">"The Most Dangerous Man In America"</span></a> and listen to this former coldwar war planner and the Vietnam war planner with the Rand Corp. explain how modern war works from Truman forward. The sock puppet and his or her political party is meaningless and Ellsberg firsthand account makes that glaring obvious IMO. Ellsberg clearly shows from a firsthand account that Iraq was not the first war started on a lie and makes one seriously question if all wars aren't started on lies.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 885058, member: 2189"] As for Napolitano on killing in this fashion and pay attention as he also names Bush in this too. [MEDIA=youtube]N3xf56nWU0E[/MEDIA] As to Saddam Hussein, yeah, I understand what you are saying and if people fully understood how he came to power with the aid of American CIA and other related interests, it might make this an even bigger story. We didn't find any WMD because it had "made in US" or "made by NATO member nation" stamped on the side and to find that would have ripped the veil off the curtain rod. And let's not forget the Saudi relationship in all of this either. What began this whole dark history was to protect the Saudi royals and their kingdom in the first place. It also didn't help that Saddam in 1999' toyed with violating "the law" that all oil transacted globally would be sold in dollars and instead tired to undermine the US by creating an oil market trading oil for Euros. Funny, that the 4 nations having challenged the dominance of the dollar, those being Iraq, Iran, Venezuela and Libya, 2 have new leaders and govt's, 1 experienced a covert US backed coup attempt and the last is painted the pariah of the world. Change all these nationstates to some corp. name and everyone would see the naked business actions for exactly what they are. Hostile Corp. takeovers. Or takedowns! Would we tolerate our firstborn going to war so that one corp. could take out another corp.? Would we sacrifice our own lives literally so UPS could takeout FedEx? Would we send our children to do it? If you want to understand the modern nature of war, go to Netflix and watch the Daniel Ellsberg documentary [URL='https://web.archive.org/web/20150320153931/http://www.mostdangerousman.org/'][COLOR=#ff0000]"The Most Dangerous Man In America"[/COLOR][/URL] and listen to this former coldwar war planner and the Vietnam war planner with the Rand Corp. explain how modern war works from Truman forward. The sock puppet and his or her political party is meaningless and Ellsberg firsthand account makes that glaring obvious IMO. Ellsberg clearly shows from a firsthand account that Iraq was not the first war started on a lie and makes one seriously question if all wars aren't started on lies. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
OBAMA gets another high profile Terror suspect! Who's tough on terror now?
Top