Obama's nightmare...the phone rings at 3:00 AM and...
- Thread starter soberups
- Start date
You're letting Tie get to you...Susie is not hiding around every corner...
tieguy
Banned
Before you undue his mess you have to put the brakes on the most destructive session of congress in history. Look at the unemployment rate Bush had it down to 4.4 percent in March of 2007. Since then this destructive phase of congress has jacked it up to 6.5 percent. Liberals just can't manage government.
Since Bush had it down to 4.4 percent How much of his "mess" do you think Obama will undue. Will he get it down to say 3.5 percent?
Any predicitions on where the rock star will take us?
Do the campaign workers he screwed out of their earings count as employed or unemployed?
tieguy
Banned
I would say that Obama does not have control over the stock market. But the stock market has always boosted off the election of a new president. For some reason the financial gurus and investors who have listened to Barock star speak economics were not impressed and sold quickly upon his election.
tieguy
Banned
chev
Nightcrawler
Yes we will all prostrate ourselves to him and take his mark on forehead or hand. All hail the anti-messiah! ALL HAIL!! HOLY IS HIS NAME!
Dude, he is just a man. Stop getting so offended.
soberups
Pees in the brown Koolaid
The most destructive Congress in history cant do anything except submit bills for President Bush to sign. If what they are submitting is so bad, why have we not seen any vetoes?
paidslave
Well-Known Member
tieguy
Banned
Hmmm republican president and republican congress = strong, healthy , growing , low unemployement rate economy.
republican president and liberal led congress = economic disaster.
Gee whiz lets see whats different here? hmmmmm
chev
Nightcrawler
NO NO NO. You have it all wrong. Don't you know it is all Bush's fault. He alone brought down the economy.
Hmmm.....pork pork pork...that is what congress is best at.
"She" is around hiding under another name. He is not hard to spot. We banned yet another alias a few weeks ago, I'm thinking about doing the same with his new one.
chev
Nightcrawler
Is this person spoofing their ip address? I would assume that is how they keep getting back on. How desperate.
I noticed a couple that just happened to show up the same time in October with similar attitudes. Not saying they are the same, but just suspicious.
tieguy
Banned
diesel96
Well-Known Member
Just curious, when's the last time BC banned a conservative ?
<----Whistling Jeopardy Music
Not a fan of the fairness Doctrine, nor am I a fan of censorship.
Tie, in a round-about way your right about your pet peeve of the month, this has been a destructive congress. They were elected in as majority 2 years ago but FAILED to shut this facist, renegade neo-con Republican Gov't down and bring this leadership to justice. Instead, the new Congress caves into granting the hi-jacked Republican party constituents, their every whim and fantasy. All of your other accusations your ranting about the Democrat Majority Congress have no legs to stand on except repeating Lindbaugh's pet peeve issue of the week. This week he's blaming the financial meltdown on Obama. I'm expecting to hear some of these rants shortly as well.
<----Whistling Jeopardy MusicNot a fan of the fairness Doctrine, nor am I a fan of censorship.
Tie, in a round-about way your right about your pet peeve of the month, this has been a destructive congress. They were elected in as majority 2 years ago but FAILED to shut this facist, renegade neo-con Republican Gov't down and bring this leadership to justice. Instead, the new Congress caves into granting the hi-jacked Republican party constituents, their every whim and fantasy. All of your other accusations your ranting about the Democrat Majority Congress have no legs to stand on except repeating Lindbaugh's pet peeve issue of the week. This week he's blaming the financial meltdown on Obama. I'm expecting to hear some of these rants shortly as well.
chev
Nightcrawler
Just curious, when's the last time BC banned a conservative ?
Not a fan of the fairness Doctrine, nor am I a fan of censorship.
Tie, in a round-about way your right about your pet peeve of the month, this has been a destructive congress. They were elected in as majority 2 years ago but FAILED to shut this facist, renegade neo-con Republican Gov't down and bring this leadership to justice. Instead, the new Congress caves into granting the hi-jacked Republican party constituents, their every whim and fantasy. All of your other accusations your ranting about the Democrat Majority Congress have no legs to stand on except repeating Lindbaugh's pet peeve issue of the week. This week he's blaming the financial meltdown on Obama. I'm expecting to hear some of these rants shortly as well.
Catatonic
Nine Lives
When was the last time they banned a liberal?
From what I've seen, they just ban A**hole Jerks.
tieguy
Banned
Just curious, when's the last time BC banned a conservative ?
Not a fan of the fairness Doctrine, nor am I a fan of censorship.
Diesel keep this one out of the liberal versus conservative venue. The person that has been getting banned engaged in what could amount to criminal stalking. There are actually laws out there that cover internet stalking. the state of Arizona for example appears to have some nicely written legal language on this topic. hint...hint....hint.
Last edited:
tieguy
Banned
Tie, in a round-about way your right about your pet peeve of the month, this has been a destructive congress. They were elected in as majority 2 years ago but FAILED to shut this facist, renegade neo-con Republican Gov't down and bring this leadership to justice. Instead, the new Congress caves into granting the hi-jacked Republican party constituents, their every whim and fantasy. All of your other accusations your ranting about the Democrat Majority Congress have no legs to stand on except repeating Lindbaugh's pet peeve issue of the week. This week he's blaming the financial meltdown on Obama. I'm expecting to hear some of these rants shortly as well.
Real simple our liberal congress could have done things this year to help curtail the dramatic economic crash. As an example Pelosi refused to address the rising fuel cost issues and allowed congress to adjourn despite a concerted effort by americans to force them to address the issue before leaving.
I believe congress willfully refused to address the crashing economy because they knew it would help Obama get elected. They let an economy that was one of the strongest in history as recently as last year crash and burn quickly for political gain.
your side keeps calling it a bush economy. I keep pointing out that not only was Bush's hands on the wheel but so were the hands of your liberal congress.
You can't argue that point.
MrFedEx
Engorged Member
One of the major items holding-up any recovery plans is Bush's insistence on a free trade pact with Colombia, which, if passed, would add a tiny bit of commerce to our present dismally low level. Most pundits think it's a last-minute move by the departing President to throw a wrench into the Democratic Congress ala' Bush 1, who dumped a nearly complete NAFTA agreement onto Bill Clinton's lap when he assumed the office. Is "W" trying to do the same thing?
If so, torpedoing the recovery effort for the sake of politics is disgusting, but entirely plausible given the way Bush/Cheney have screwed this county over.
Given the conservative bias on this site, I fully expect to be blasted from all quarters...I'm used to it, so go ahead and fire.
If so, torpedoing the recovery effort for the sake of politics is disgusting, but entirely plausible given the way Bush/Cheney have screwed this county over.
Given the conservative bias on this site, I fully expect to be blasted from all quarters...I'm used to it, so go ahead and fire.
Catatonic
Nine Lives
I've heard worse but if you insist. Peoyoooong!
