"On Topic" How would you want it handled? The same way?

[sortaisle]

I work in this area. The driveways can be half a mile long so this poor guy is probably going to have to have his packages picked up at the center because we now have a policy of no leash, no delivery. It's a no win situation really, but if you know a package is coming, house your dogs. If you're not home, house your dogs. Dogs barking is the biggest deterant for theft, not dogs attacking. In my mind, I am sad for the owner, but he brought this on himself by being an irresponsible owner. It's no mistake both of his dogs were out wandering.

 

[gman042]

UPS has set a precedent that by acknowledging culpability to that first person that lost a dog to a UPS driver when the owner was an irresponsible owner and it is an ongoing issue.
We had a on car sup that refused to allow one of her drivers to be charged with an accident after hitting a dog. She reminded the owner there were leash laws for a reason. She Told the owner that IF her driver had been injured while trying to avoid a dog loose in the roadway they were liable. She then had the owner sign a paper stating that they released UPS and the driver from responsibility.
It was a hard line to take knowing the circumstances but it should been the stance UPS should have had from the beginning.

 

[JackStraw]

The driveways can be half a mile long

I'm wondering if UPS overlooks the "Stay out of driveways" rules for this particular area. Remember, "Safety first". As long as it doesn't get in the way of production.

 

[10 point]

There are people who do try to claim their pets as dependents. They are called defendants.

They got them a Social Security #?

 

[wayfair]

I'm wondering if UPS overlooks the "Stay out of driveways" rules for this particular area. Remember, "Safety first". As long as it doesn't get in the way of production.

I use, DR, arrow down, D (it says "gate" in our boards)