Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Over allowed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JustTired" data-source="post: 217586" data-attributes="member: 10234"><p>One thing I could never figure out is.....</p><p> </p><p>How can a company who seems to stay on top of everything suddenly decide 6,7,8 years after the fact that they never adjusted the numbers to reflect using the diad?</p><p> </p><p>My opinion on it is that when IE became the 'darlings' of the company, someone suggested that the "bonus drivers" were making too much money and we need to get some of that money back. Changing the numbers, using the excuse that the diad had not been figured in to the allowance, was the answer. </p><p> </p><p>Don't get me wrong. The diad was a good thing. But did it actually save a driver that much time? My opinion is that it saved more time for everybody behind the driver (no more paper audits, filing paper, delivery conformations, etc.) than it did the driver. Anybody ever have to punch in 40-50 pkgs by hand because they wouldn't scan?</p><p> </p><p>The 'numbers' really shouldn't mean anything to the hourly, but people like to have an idea how they "stack up" in the big picture. Unfortunately, the numbers are so "out of wack" that they just tend to be a morale buster.</p><p> </p><p> "LIVE BY THE NUMBERS-DIE BY THE NUMBERS"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JustTired, post: 217586, member: 10234"] One thing I could never figure out is..... How can a company who seems to stay on top of everything suddenly decide 6,7,8 years after the fact that they never adjusted the numbers to reflect using the diad? My opinion on it is that when IE became the 'darlings' of the company, someone suggested that the "bonus drivers" were making too much money and we need to get some of that money back. Changing the numbers, using the excuse that the diad had not been figured in to the allowance, was the answer. Don't get me wrong. The diad was a good thing. But did it actually save a driver that much time? My opinion is that it saved more time for everybody behind the driver (no more paper audits, filing paper, delivery conformations, etc.) than it did the driver. Anybody ever have to punch in 40-50 pkgs by hand because they wouldn't scan? The 'numbers' really shouldn't mean anything to the hourly, but people like to have an idea how they "stack up" in the big picture. Unfortunately, the numbers are so "out of wack" that they just tend to be a morale buster. "LIVE BY THE NUMBERS-DIE BY THE NUMBERS" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Over allowed
Top