Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Pelosi
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 540397" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>Backroom deal or not, the simple fact is a republican president put her onto the federal bench. When Clinton nominated her to the appellant court 25 republicans voted to confirm her just as when Ginsburg was voted on, only 3 repubs. voted against. You guys scream and scream about SCOTUS and yet you ignore the fact that 7 of 9 judges (about to be 6 of 9) are republican appointees. So much for the party of rightousness as based on their voting, they were in on the deal!</p><p></p><p>One of the reasons President Obama may have picked Sotomayer is because more and more he's looking at gov't intervention of the neural highway and byways otherwise known as the cyberworld. Turns out Sotomayer is rather <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/05/sotomayor/" target="_blank"><span style="color: red">schooled in Cyber law</span></a>. As we all know Obama has his Cyber Czar (another Russian style title) and he may be placing his handpicked expert of whom the other justices may default to when discussing case law that I'm sure will arise. I'm more interested in the paper Sotomayer wrote as a 21 year old defending the right of secession and if she still holds those views. I hope so!</p><p></p><p>Sotomayer is not really my cup of tea either but I've not seen the republican party nominate anyone that gave me a "Chris Matthew's Leg moment" either so there you go. <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /> (He'll never live that down!)</p><p></p><p>The real irony of Sotomayer is that she very well could be "Blowback" from American Empire. Had we given Puerto Rico her freedom in 1899' after 500 years of European bondage instead of making her our own posession, Sotomayer's family might have stayed in Puerto Rico and thus she would never be here in the first place.</p><p></p><p>Welcome to <strong>your</strong> Empire of <strong>your</strong> own Destruction!</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/emoticons/rofl.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rofl:" title="Rofl :rofl:" data-shortname=":rofl:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 540397, member: 2189"] Backroom deal or not, the simple fact is a republican president put her onto the federal bench. When Clinton nominated her to the appellant court 25 republicans voted to confirm her just as when Ginsburg was voted on, only 3 repubs. voted against. You guys scream and scream about SCOTUS and yet you ignore the fact that 7 of 9 judges (about to be 6 of 9) are republican appointees. So much for the party of rightousness as based on their voting, they were in on the deal! One of the reasons President Obama may have picked Sotomayer is because more and more he's looking at gov't intervention of the neural highway and byways otherwise known as the cyberworld. Turns out Sotomayer is rather [URL='http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/05/sotomayor/'][COLOR=red]schooled in Cyber law[/COLOR][/URL]. As we all know Obama has his Cyber Czar (another Russian style title) and he may be placing his handpicked expert of whom the other justices may default to when discussing case law that I'm sure will arise. I'm more interested in the paper Sotomayer wrote as a 21 year old defending the right of secession and if she still holds those views. I hope so! Sotomayer is not really my cup of tea either but I've not seen the republican party nominate anyone that gave me a "Chris Matthew's Leg moment" either so there you go. :happy-very: (He'll never live that down!) The real irony of Sotomayer is that she very well could be "Blowback" from American Empire. Had we given Puerto Rico her freedom in 1899' after 500 years of European bondage instead of making her our own posession, Sotomayer's family might have stayed in Puerto Rico and thus she would never be here in the first place. Welcome to [B]your[/B] Empire of [B]your[/B] own Destruction! :rofl: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Pelosi
Top