Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Retirement Topics
Pension Agency Faces a New Front
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 54931"><p>I'm sure the potential for benefit cuts will raise some neckhairs but what peaks my interest is the 2nd sentence above where it sez UPS could make higher payments into effected pension systems. Would this be a part of a partition idea floated a couple of years ago? Also would the higher than required payments only be for UPSers or would it also spread over the the other company members? No idea to the answers on my part but just throwing out a couple of questions that came to mind while reading the article.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 54931"] I'm sure the potential for benefit cuts will raise some neckhairs but what peaks my interest is the 2nd sentence above where it sez UPS could make higher payments into effected pension systems. Would this be a part of a partition idea floated a couple of years ago? Also would the higher than required payments only be for UPSers or would it also spread over the the other company members? No idea to the answers on my part but just throwing out a couple of questions that came to mind while reading the article. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Retirement Topics
Pension Agency Faces a New Front
Top