Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Planned Parenthood
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Overpaid Union Thug" data-source="post: 1750270" data-attributes="member: 198"><p>Wrong again.......</p><p></p><p>Read carefully........</p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://healthland.time.com/2012/06/07/morning-after-pill-akin-to-abortion-the-science-says-no/" target="_blank">http://healthland.time.com/2012/06/07/morning-after-pill-akin-to-abortion-the-science-says-no/</a></p><p></p><p>Or more specifically.....</p><p></p><p></p><p><em>"The story of how the <u>implantation myth</u> got started is more complicated: apparently, <u>the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) felt obliged to mention the possibility that emergency contraception could thwart implantation of a fertilized egg — even though there was no scientific evidence of that fact — on the label</u>, back in 1999 when the first morning-after pill, Plan B, was approved. What was the agency’s hunch based on? According to Belluck, it was partly “wishful thinking” and partly the fact that daily birth control pills, some of which contain progesterone, Plan B’s active ingredient, may alter the lining of the uterus, which is where a fertilized egg would implant. Never mind that such alterations haven’t been proven to prevent implantation or that morning-after pills don’t actually trigger such changes anyway.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em><u>Over the years, as evidence mounted that the morning-after pill didn’t interfere with implantation</u>, the makers of Plan B, which is now sold as Plan B One-Step, repeatedly asked the FDA to delete that language from the label. The FDA repeatedly declined. Citing confidentiality, FDA officials wouldn’t tell Belluck why."</em></p><p><em></em></p><p>With that said.....My position is that once the egg attaches and a fetus is formed then it's game off. But to argue whether or not cell(s), fertilized eggs, an what not are life and therefore are children seems a bit silly to me. Because if that's the stance people really want to take then hell......every time a man uses a condom he ends up killing potential babies. Lots of them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Overpaid Union Thug, post: 1750270, member: 198"] Wrong again....... Read carefully........ [URL]http://healthland.time.com/2012/06/07/morning-after-pill-akin-to-abortion-the-science-says-no/[/URL] Or more specifically..... [I]"The story of how the [U]implantation myth[/U] got started is more complicated: apparently, [U]the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) felt obliged to mention the possibility that emergency contraception could thwart implantation of a fertilized egg — even though there was no scientific evidence of that fact — on the label[/U], back in 1999 when the first morning-after pill, Plan B, was approved. What was the agency’s hunch based on? According to Belluck, it was partly “wishful thinking” and partly the fact that daily birth control pills, some of which contain progesterone, Plan B’s active ingredient, may alter the lining of the uterus, which is where a fertilized egg would implant. Never mind that such alterations haven’t been proven to prevent implantation or that morning-after pills don’t actually trigger such changes anyway. [U]Over the years, as evidence mounted that the morning-after pill didn’t interfere with implantation[/U], the makers of Plan B, which is now sold as Plan B One-Step, repeatedly asked the FDA to delete that language from the label. The FDA repeatedly declined. Citing confidentiality, FDA officials wouldn’t tell Belluck why." [/I] With that said.....My position is that once the egg attaches and a fetus is formed then it's game off. But to argue whether or not cell(s), fertilized eggs, an what not are life and therefore are children seems a bit silly to me. Because if that's the stance people really want to take then hell......every time a man uses a condom he ends up killing potential babies. Lots of them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Planned Parenthood
Top