Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Poll: Who do you Think Will be The Next POTUS?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 5797985" data-attributes="member: 24302"><p>The Sandy Hook killer is a prime example. His mother was a gun collector. She also saw that he needed serious help mentally. She didn't secure those guns and got murdered with one of them. Then he murdered all those kids. If he hadn't killed her but used her gun to kill others then she should have been held accountable. If we don't come up with solutions to save at least some from dying then we are essentially saying that our right to own guns is more important than the lives of others up to the point that we won't allow even one small concession that might save lives. </p><p></p><p>Not everyone who sees a psychiatrist is a potential murderer. Not by a long shot. Day to day fusses with your family or neighbors, having arguments doesn't qualify either. But raging that you're going to kill someone should get you detained at least long enough to be evaluated. And if you are determined to be a threat then any weapons you may have should be confiscated until such time a mental health professional determines you're no longer a threat. Someone posting online raging against heterosexuals and she's going to kill some to get even should raise red flags. That was the Nashville shooter. How many could've been saved if she had been taken seriously?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 5797985, member: 24302"] The Sandy Hook killer is a prime example. His mother was a gun collector. She also saw that he needed serious help mentally. She didn't secure those guns and got murdered with one of them. Then he murdered all those kids. If he hadn't killed her but used her gun to kill others then she should have been held accountable. If we don't come up with solutions to save at least some from dying then we are essentially saying that our right to own guns is more important than the lives of others up to the point that we won't allow even one small concession that might save lives. Not everyone who sees a psychiatrist is a potential murderer. Not by a long shot. Day to day fusses with your family or neighbors, having arguments doesn't qualify either. But raging that you're going to kill someone should get you detained at least long enough to be evaluated. And if you are determined to be a threat then any weapons you may have should be confiscated until such time a mental health professional determines you're no longer a threat. Someone posting online raging against heterosexuals and she's going to kill some to get even should raise red flags. That was the Nashville shooter. How many could've been saved if she had been taken seriously? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Poll: Who do you Think Will be The Next POTUS?
Top