Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Presidential Candidacy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 283613" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>That's a rather interesting point to consider there trplnkl. So your point is they wanted to kill the infidels to make a point. OK, I'll go with this. It would also stand to reason based on what we've been told that the religion of these folks demand them to kill any and all infidels who refuse to be converted, at least that is the message I get from some quarters. Seems a reasonable point to make about a group of mad men. No quarrel from me.</p><p> </p><p>But there's a problem that has me confused. When the Soviets invaded Afghanistan, many of these same folks like OBL himself, stood shoulder to shoulder with western infidels to fight the Russian Bear and gladly accepted infidel money and arms to do so. Charlie Wilson, Texas democrat Congressman is just one example and there were tons of privateer efforts too. In the 10 year battle, never once did muslim fighters raise up against it's western infidel friend. The Bear was an invading "Empirical" force and seen as such and the western infidel was a friend coming to help beat back the "Empire" builders. </p><p> </p><p>In fact, when the Bear withdrew back to the north, the western infidels backed so to speak the Taliban over the Afghan warlords which in 96' seated a gov't based on fundamental Islamic extremes. The backing was done in the name of the War on Drugs because Sharia law demanded poppy production be destroyed and it was drastically cut. Since Taliban have left poppy production has skyrocketed.</p><p> </p><p>But then something changed did it not? Something happened to change all of this after the 1989' Soviet retreat.. The first real hint for us was the 1993' bombing of the WTC but that wasn't OBL but rather done but terrorsit based in NYC with the financial backing and planning of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Now Mohammed was Al Qaeda but he wasn't based in Afghanistan but rather in Kuwait. According ot the 9/11 Commission report, Mohammed was consider the principle architect of the 9/11 attacks but he was also behind others like the killing of Daniel Pearl, the Bali nightclub bombings and numerous other failed attempts. Wow, Kuwait, I wonder if that plays in role in all of this. What do you think? </p><p> </p><p>When was Al Qaeda's first known attack to have taken place? Considered by many, the first known attack was on December 29, 1992' when 2 hotels in Aden, Yemen were bombed killing 2 Austrian tourist but the experts say the intended targets were US Servicemen. US Servicemen! 1992! What was happening in that region in the timeframe of 1992' with US Servicemen that would upset Sunni Muslim believers in an extreme form of Islam and deathly loyal to a Holy and Pure Saudi homeland?</p><p> </p><p>Hmmmm there trplnkl, you think we may be on to something here? What happened in 1990', 1991', or 1992' to a group of radical Sunni muslims who believe to the death in a pure and holy land in Saudi Arabia that should be always free of infidel presence? I just got this feeling you've stumbled on to something here but I just can't quite put my finger on it. Maybe someone here can fill in the missing piece and we can figure this whole thing out. Thanks for the post and the foresight on your part to open this door. Awesome dude!</p><p> </p><p>Enquiring minds want to know!</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink2:" title="Wink :wink2:" data-shortname=":wink2:" /></p><p> </p><p>Warning to Jones: Sitdown and drink that coffee!</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 283613, member: 2189"] That's a rather interesting point to consider there trplnkl. So your point is they wanted to kill the infidels to make a point. OK, I'll go with this. It would also stand to reason based on what we've been told that the religion of these folks demand them to kill any and all infidels who refuse to be converted, at least that is the message I get from some quarters. Seems a reasonable point to make about a group of mad men. No quarrel from me. But there's a problem that has me confused. When the Soviets invaded Afghanistan, many of these same folks like OBL himself, stood shoulder to shoulder with western infidels to fight the Russian Bear and gladly accepted infidel money and arms to do so. Charlie Wilson, Texas democrat Congressman is just one example and there were tons of privateer efforts too. In the 10 year battle, never once did muslim fighters raise up against it's western infidel friend. The Bear was an invading "Empirical" force and seen as such and the western infidel was a friend coming to help beat back the "Empire" builders. In fact, when the Bear withdrew back to the north, the western infidels backed so to speak the Taliban over the Afghan warlords which in 96' seated a gov't based on fundamental Islamic extremes. The backing was done in the name of the War on Drugs because Sharia law demanded poppy production be destroyed and it was drastically cut. Since Taliban have left poppy production has skyrocketed. But then something changed did it not? Something happened to change all of this after the 1989' Soviet retreat.. The first real hint for us was the 1993' bombing of the WTC but that wasn't OBL but rather done but terrorsit based in NYC with the financial backing and planning of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Now Mohammed was Al Qaeda but he wasn't based in Afghanistan but rather in Kuwait. According ot the 9/11 Commission report, Mohammed was consider the principle architect of the 9/11 attacks but he was also behind others like the killing of Daniel Pearl, the Bali nightclub bombings and numerous other failed attempts. Wow, Kuwait, I wonder if that plays in role in all of this. What do you think? When was Al Qaeda's first known attack to have taken place? Considered by many, the first known attack was on December 29, 1992' when 2 hotels in Aden, Yemen were bombed killing 2 Austrian tourist but the experts say the intended targets were US Servicemen. US Servicemen! 1992! What was happening in that region in the timeframe of 1992' with US Servicemen that would upset Sunni Muslim believers in an extreme form of Islam and deathly loyal to a Holy and Pure Saudi homeland? Hmmmm there trplnkl, you think we may be on to something here? What happened in 1990', 1991', or 1992' to a group of radical Sunni muslims who believe to the death in a pure and holy land in Saudi Arabia that should be always free of infidel presence? I just got this feeling you've stumbled on to something here but I just can't quite put my finger on it. Maybe someone here can fill in the missing piece and we can figure this whole thing out. Thanks for the post and the foresight on your part to open this door. Awesome dude! Enquiring minds want to know! :wink2: Warning to Jones: Sitdown and drink that coffee! :happy-very: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Presidential Candidacy
Top