Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Pretty Low - But Not Surprised
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Maui" data-source="post: 1503799" data-attributes="member: 45037"><p>Perhaps. The recommendation of the HCMP to wait on retirement means the complainant will likely get at least what would have been paid had Lesly chosen "early" retirement. </p><p></p><p>This is also part of a much larger conversation about the discriminatory nature of the law with respect to LGBT citizens. FedEx may be right on the the letter of the federal law, but certainly not the spirit of CA law. </p><p></p><p>Time will tell the outcome. In the meantime, a family lost a loved one and their main source of income and could have already been receiving the retirement Lesly earned if she were given all the relevant information prior to her passing. I think FedEx was trying to do right by her family in keeping her employed to pay medical, but it had the negative result of taking away earned benefits and leaving the family with nothing even after 26 years. </p><p></p><p>The federal law was discriminatory and unconstitutional. These are the kinds of results when politicians put hate and bigotry above love and family.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Maui, post: 1503799, member: 45037"] Perhaps. The recommendation of the HCMP to wait on retirement means the complainant will likely get at least what would have been paid had Lesly chosen "early" retirement. This is also part of a much larger conversation about the discriminatory nature of the law with respect to LGBT citizens. FedEx may be right on the the letter of the federal law, but certainly not the spirit of CA law. Time will tell the outcome. In the meantime, a family lost a loved one and their main source of income and could have already been receiving the retirement Lesly earned if she were given all the relevant information prior to her passing. I think FedEx was trying to do right by her family in keeping her employed to pay medical, but it had the negative result of taking away earned benefits and leaving the family with nothing even after 26 years. The federal law was discriminatory and unconstitutional. These are the kinds of results when politicians put hate and bigotry above love and family. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Pretty Low - But Not Surprised
Top