Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Production termination!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brownIEman" data-source="post: 459393" data-attributes="member: 14596"><p>You are right on with the other immediate questions. I would assume that as an experienced driver and steward, he would be able to avoid most of the problems you mentioned. It should have been made clear to him that the rides were performance rides, and as you told the sup in your example, it is quite clear in the contract that any ride in which a sup assists a driver cannot be used as a performance ride. I may be assuming too much though.</p><p> </p><p>It does sound like the center management targeted the guy specifically. But if that is the case, I cannot understand why he could either not demonstrate that to the arbitrator or they just could not see it. If he was targeted for union activity, not only would that be wrong and illegal, I consider it weak on the part of management that does it. Targeting someone for filing grievances is assinine. I have had grievances filed against me for doing hourly work. Some were valid, some were not, but none would I allow myself to take personally or look for "payback". That, as I said, takes a weak management team. Just my 2c.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brownIEman, post: 459393, member: 14596"] You are right on with the other immediate questions. I would assume that as an experienced driver and steward, he would be able to avoid most of the problems you mentioned. It should have been made clear to him that the rides were performance rides, and as you told the sup in your example, it is quite clear in the contract that any ride in which a sup assists a driver cannot be used as a performance ride. I may be assuming too much though. It does sound like the center management targeted the guy specifically. But if that is the case, I cannot understand why he could either not demonstrate that to the arbitrator or they just could not see it. If he was targeted for union activity, not only would that be wrong and illegal, I consider it weak on the part of management that does it. Targeting someone for filing grievances is assinine. I have had grievances filed against me for doing hourly work. Some were valid, some were not, but none would I allow myself to take personally or look for "payback". That, as I said, takes a weak management team. Just my 2c. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Production termination!
Top