Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Progression pay
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gandydancer" data-source="post: 494323" data-attributes="member: 9310"><p>They could decide the case but declare it has no precedential value. Most of the actual decisions say exactly that. What's the good of sending a case back to a level where it's already been deadlocked?</p><p> </p><p>MOE = "memorandum of understanding". E.g., if you look at the pdf of the 2002 contract there are attached two MOEs, an "Addendum", two "Agreement"s, and then two more MOEs. Including one about not filling 22.3 openings that I hadn't noticed before...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gandydancer, post: 494323, member: 9310"] They could decide the case but declare it has no precedential value. Most of the actual decisions say exactly that. What's the good of sending a case back to a level where it's already been deadlocked? MOE = "memorandum of understanding". E.g., if you look at the pdf of the 2002 contract there are attached two MOEs, an "Addendum", two "Agreement"s, and then two more MOEs. Including one about not filling 22.3 openings that I hadn't noticed before... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Progression pay
Top