he probably likes when corporations dont pay taxes, but not when government gives money to corporations or something sillyWhat's the difference?
he probably likes when corporations dont pay taxes, but not when government gives money to corporations or something sillyWhat's the difference?
Apparently he thinks businesses who can't survive on their own should get government handouts. Oddly enough he doesn't feel the same way for individual citizens. Typical hypocrisy for a Neo-conservative.he probably likes when corporations dont pay taxes, but not when government gives money to corporations or something silly
he probably likes when corporations dont pay taxes, but not when government gives money to corporations or something silly
Corporations don't pay taxes, People do.
Don't give money to corporations? He wouldn't be an Obama supporter then.
You don't appear to be a Trump fan.I also voted for Perot.
If he/she ain't a politician, they have my vote.
this one is about corporate welfare, the other is about exploitation in capitalism.any chance we can combine these socialistic marketing threads into one?
I voted for Trump in our primary. He will not get my vote in November.You don't appear to be a Trump fan.
You have to factor in all their corporate welfare. When you factor in all the subsidies lots of companies pay negative tax rates.I don't see how they got their numbers. Jetblue, for example, shows in their 10K.
2015. 2014.
Income. : 1097 623
Tax expense: 420 222
Tax loopholes, incentives are there to encourage spending. Spending that may not take place without them. Besides, their 10K shows a tax expense of $420 mil in 2015 and $222 mil in 2014. We're did they come up with $20 mil in 2015? And $29 mil from 2011-2015?You have to factor in all their corporate welfare. When you factor in all the subsidies lots of companies pay negative tax rates.
Not to mention tax loopholes.
"Jetblue, PG&E and Ryder used accelerated depreciation, a tax break that allows companies to write off the cost of their capital investments much faster than these investments wear out, to dramatically reduce their tax rates. CTJ has estimated that closing the accelerated depreciation loophole could raise more than $428 billion over the next decade.[2] Both Congress and President Barack Obama, however, have supported expanding the scope of this tax break in recent years. "
Tax loopholes, incentives are there to encourage spending. Spending that may not take place without them.
IF the government is going to be giving anyone money, it should go to people who earn $16/hr or less, not a bunch of already wealthy corporationsTax loopholes, incentives are there to encourage spending. Spending that may not take place without them. Besides, their 10K shows a tax expense of $420 mil in 2015 and $222 mil in 2014. We're did they come up with $20 mil in 2015? And $29 mil from 2011-2015?
hows yours working lol?Go to Venezuela and report on how well their system of gov't is working .
2 day work weeks would seem like something that you could enjoy .
IF the government is going to be giving anyone money, it should go to people who earn $16/hr or less, not a bunch of already wealthy corporations
IF the government is going to be giving anyone money, it should go to people who earn $16/hr or less, not a bunch of already wealthy corporations