Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
Redesigned mip
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pretzel_man" data-source="post: 51899"><p>To clarify a few points from my perspective: </p><p> </p><p>If a manager is not leaving until retirement, the deferred compensation is a good thing. Pay less taxes and the stock is not taxed until vesting. That means its working for the individual over that period of time. </p><p> </p><p>Second, if you look at the business objectives identified, three are growth initiatives, and two are cost initiatives. Seems like a good thing where everyone should focus. </p><p> </p><p>That gets us to the fact that "maybe" less than 15% of profits will be given out. </p><p> </p><p>As was said, this along with the deferred vesting is a good deal for the company... </p><p> </p><p>If its a good deal for the company, then its a good thing for the stock. </p><p> </p><p>I'd much rather see a growth in stock than a higher MIP. </p><p> </p><p>If this gets us there, its good for everyone, isn't it? </p><p> </p><p>By the way, lets say the company gives out 13.5% of profits instead of 15%. That's $75M that the company would keep. </p><p> </p><p>Where would it go? A new building? More sales people?, I don't know, but I bet it goes someplace that is good for UPS stock. </p><p> </p><p>Isn't that what MIP was about in the first place? </p><p> </p><p>P-Man</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pretzel_man, post: 51899"] To clarify a few points from my perspective: If a manager is not leaving until retirement, the deferred compensation is a good thing. Pay less taxes and the stock is not taxed until vesting. That means its working for the individual over that period of time. Second, if you look at the business objectives identified, three are growth initiatives, and two are cost initiatives. Seems like a good thing where everyone should focus. That gets us to the fact that "maybe" less than 15% of profits will be given out. As was said, this along with the deferred vesting is a good deal for the company... If its a good deal for the company, then its a good thing for the stock. I'd much rather see a growth in stock than a higher MIP. If this gets us there, its good for everyone, isn't it? By the way, lets say the company gives out 13.5% of profits instead of 15%. That's $75M that the company would keep. Where would it go? A new building? More sales people?, I don't know, but I bet it goes someplace that is good for UPS stock. Isn't that what MIP was about in the first place? P-Man [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
Redesigned mip
Top