Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Regal Cinema's new "security policy"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 1820035" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>How is it different? Gun safety is gun safety, and situational awareness is situational awareness regardless of your location. I would not be opposed to high standards, but they would have to be <em>fair and realistic </em>standards that were created by people with actual knowledge and training about guns. And the cost of the licensing should either be free or minimal. The right to self-defense should not only belong to the wealthy and privileged elite. This is my biggest problem with Michael Bloomberg; he campaigns to deny gun rights to the unwashed masses, yet he has used his wealth and political connections to secure New York and New Jersey gun permits for his personal bodyguards that are impossible for the normal person to obtain. Even worse, he owns a residence in Bermuda, which is part of the UK and where guns are prohibited, making the entire island a "gun free zone". Even the <em>police</em> don't routinely carry guns, yet Bloomberg has obtained permission for <em>his</em> bodyguards to be armed. If "gun free zones" are good enough for the rest of us, why not for him?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 1820035, member: 14668"] How is it different? Gun safety is gun safety, and situational awareness is situational awareness regardless of your location. I would not be opposed to high standards, but they would have to be [I]fair and realistic [/I]standards that were created by people with actual knowledge and training about guns. And the cost of the licensing should either be free or minimal. The right to self-defense should not only belong to the wealthy and privileged elite. This is my biggest problem with Michael Bloomberg; he campaigns to deny gun rights to the unwashed masses, yet he has used his wealth and political connections to secure New York and New Jersey gun permits for his personal bodyguards that are impossible for the normal person to obtain. Even worse, he owns a residence in Bermuda, which is part of the UK and where guns are prohibited, making the entire island a "gun free zone". Even the [I]police[/I] don't routinely carry guns, yet Bloomberg has obtained permission for [I]his[/I] bodyguards to be armed. If "gun free zones" are good enough for the rest of us, why not for him? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Regal Cinema's new "security policy"
Top