Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
Restructuring - The good, bad and ugly.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jones" data-source="post: 795014" data-attributes="member: 4805"><p>How would it be my fault, I wasn't on the panel that made the decision to reinstate him. You keep making these accusations of "unethical" behavior but you won't give any details or reasons as to why you think the panel made an unethical decision. Obviously they felt differently about this case than you do, why do you think that is? Why would they reinstate someone who you claim is practically guaranteed to kill an innocent family? In addition you keep trying to make it sound like the BA made the decision to reinstate him, which is simply not true.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jones, post: 795014, member: 4805"] How would it be my fault, I wasn't on the panel that made the decision to reinstate him. You keep making these accusations of "unethical" behavior but you won't give any details or reasons as to why you think the panel made an unethical decision. Obviously they felt differently about this case than you do, why do you think that is? Why would they reinstate someone who you claim is practically guaranteed to kill an innocent family? In addition you keep trying to make it sound like the BA made the decision to reinstate him, which is simply not true. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
Restructuring - The good, bad and ugly.
Top