Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
RICK PERRY, a talking points robot.!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 866721" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>After a brief diversion of fun at More's expense, on the subject of Tort Reform, I question it at the federal level. While on the one hand decrying larger federal power, republicans do often enough when it comes to Tort Reform turn a blind eye and see no problem with a larger federal state overpowering individual state and local authority. From a limited gov't if not radical libertarian position, there is <a href="http://volokh.com/2011/05/23/federalism-and-tort-reform-4/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000">reason </span></a>to question the attempts of Tort Reform at the Federal level of gov't.</p><p></p><p>At the same time, many scream about so-called malpractice cases and in some they may have a point. However, there are also <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0310.mencimer.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000">exceptions </span></a>to that rule so before you head down a road so certain that you'd blow up the bridges behind you, understand you might be cutting off your nose to spite your face.</p><p></p><p>Besides, if the medical establishment were far more open to real free market competition from <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20150417145323/http://www.anh-usa.org/ama%E2%80%99s-government-protected-monopoly-squeezes-out-alternative-medicine/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000">alternative medicine</span></a> instead of using the State as it's own form of Pinkerton Agents, I might be more willing to hear their cries of "POOR POOR ME!"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 866721, member: 2189"] After a brief diversion of fun at More's expense, on the subject of Tort Reform, I question it at the federal level. While on the one hand decrying larger federal power, republicans do often enough when it comes to Tort Reform turn a blind eye and see no problem with a larger federal state overpowering individual state and local authority. From a limited gov't if not radical libertarian position, there is [URL='http://volokh.com/2011/05/23/federalism-and-tort-reform-4/'][COLOR=#ff0000]reason [/COLOR][/URL]to question the attempts of Tort Reform at the Federal level of gov't. At the same time, many scream about so-called malpractice cases and in some they may have a point. However, there are also [URL='http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0310.mencimer.html'][COLOR=#ff0000]exceptions [/COLOR][/URL]to that rule so before you head down a road so certain that you'd blow up the bridges behind you, understand you might be cutting off your nose to spite your face. Besides, if the medical establishment were far more open to real free market competition from [URL='https://web.archive.org/web/20150417145323/http://www.anh-usa.org/ama%E2%80%99s-government-protected-monopoly-squeezes-out-alternative-medicine/'][COLOR=#ff0000]alternative medicine[/COLOR][/URL] instead of using the State as it's own form of Pinkerton Agents, I might be more willing to hear their cries of "POOR POOR ME!" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
RICK PERRY, a talking points robot.!
Top