Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
RPCD forced Tues-Sat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="eats packages" data-source="post: 4797020" data-attributes="member: 68137"><p>No I'm outside of norcal. I'm just wierd with calculations is all: So I multiply the FT max contribution by a percentage of hours worked (89%) and the difference in contribution rates (82.5%) to get a percentage difference between what 'could have been earned' working FT and my current PT pension (71%)</p><p></p><p>If a PT employee worked only 1200 hours however, it would be closer to 45%.</p><p></p><p>This is just a means of interpreting the "standard pension earnings" in my provided pamplet is all, since it is geared more towards drivers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="eats packages, post: 4797020, member: 68137"] No I'm outside of norcal. I'm just wierd with calculations is all: So I multiply the FT max contribution by a percentage of hours worked (89%) and the difference in contribution rates (82.5%) to get a percentage difference between what 'could have been earned' working FT and my current PT pension (71%) If a PT employee worked only 1200 hours however, it would be closer to 45%. This is just a means of interpreting the "standard pension earnings" in my provided pamplet is all, since it is geared more towards drivers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
RPCD forced Tues-Sat
Top