Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
Life After Brown
ruger gun support
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="anonymous4" data-source="post: 1080349" data-attributes="member: 30532"><p>Also realize Justice Scalia has said he isn't even sure if the second doesn't protect SHOULDER FIRED MISSILES. Yes, anything hand-held is constitutionally protected as it should be. The second is not about sport nor hunting but about checks and balances from within. Disarming good people of their weapons will not stop mass-murder of innocents. Restricting magazines sizes and banning scary looking weapons that function the same as other semi-automatics will not stop the mass-murder of innocents. Look at the statistics of gun homicide in America. 10,000 a year? Halve that when you remove inner-city murders from gangs knocking each other off. Look at states like Idaho, Montana, the Dakotas. No major cities with overwhelming gang violence; their homicide rate per 100,000 is lower than countries with across the board gun control.</p><p></p><p>The Virgina Tech massacre involved two pistols, not the AR-15 and killed more people than any of the recent tragedies. It takes mere seconds to reload a firearm and continue shooting. Less than seconds if you're good. The arbitrary magazine size argument is nothing more than a useless restriction. You gun-grabbers are wasting critical time putting half the American population on the defense of perhaps the most important constitutional amendment instead of finding REAL WAYS to solve the problem of looney's going off the edge. Better background checks, a serious and tough look at the state of mental health in this country are the answers. Not the banning or restriction of things that have black accessories attached to them. Remember, the people interested in castrating the second amendment aren't doing it for protection of anyone. The statistics and research prove gun control does not work. Why? Because good people will remain good, crazy people will always go crazy and find ways to kill massive amounts of people. Be it with guns, bombs, fire (197 killed by arson in one attack by one lunatic), knives, poison et cetera.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf</a></p><p></p><p>"The surprising conclusion of the study:</p><p></p><p>"Nevertheless, the burden of proof rests on the proponents of the more guns equal more death and fewer guns equal less death mantra, especially</p><p>since they argue public policy ought to be based on that mantra. To bear that burden would at the very least</p><p>require showing that a large number of nations with more guns have more death and that nations that have imposed stringent gun controls have achieved substantial reductions in criminal violence (or suicide). But those correlations are not observed when a large number of nations are compared across the world".</p><p></p><p>The typical uninformed gun-grabber lawmaker:</p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]L5dT3r_oHoo[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="anonymous4, post: 1080349, member: 30532"] Also realize Justice Scalia has said he isn't even sure if the second doesn't protect SHOULDER FIRED MISSILES. Yes, anything hand-held is constitutionally protected as it should be. The second is not about sport nor hunting but about checks and balances from within. Disarming good people of their weapons will not stop mass-murder of innocents. Restricting magazines sizes and banning scary looking weapons that function the same as other semi-automatics will not stop the mass-murder of innocents. Look at the statistics of gun homicide in America. 10,000 a year? Halve that when you remove inner-city murders from gangs knocking each other off. Look at states like Idaho, Montana, the Dakotas. No major cities with overwhelming gang violence; their homicide rate per 100,000 is lower than countries with across the board gun control. The Virgina Tech massacre involved two pistols, not the AR-15 and killed more people than any of the recent tragedies. It takes mere seconds to reload a firearm and continue shooting. Less than seconds if you're good. The arbitrary magazine size argument is nothing more than a useless restriction. You gun-grabbers are wasting critical time putting half the American population on the defense of perhaps the most important constitutional amendment instead of finding REAL WAYS to solve the problem of looney's going off the edge. Better background checks, a serious and tough look at the state of mental health in this country are the answers. Not the banning or restriction of things that have black accessories attached to them. Remember, the people interested in castrating the second amendment aren't doing it for protection of anyone. The statistics and research prove gun control does not work. Why? Because good people will remain good, crazy people will always go crazy and find ways to kill massive amounts of people. Be it with guns, bombs, fire (197 killed by arson in one attack by one lunatic), knives, poison et cetera. [URL]http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf[/URL] "The surprising conclusion of the study: "Nevertheless, the burden of proof rests on the proponents of the more guns equal more death and fewer guns equal less death mantra, especially since they argue public policy ought to be based on that mantra. To bear that burden would at the very least require showing that a large number of nations with more guns have more death and that nations that have imposed stringent gun controls have achieved substantial reductions in criminal violence (or suicide). But those correlations are not observed when a large number of nations are compared across the world". The typical uninformed gun-grabber lawmaker: [MEDIA=youtube]L5dT3r_oHoo[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
Life After Brown
ruger gun support
Top