Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
Life After Brown
ruger gun support
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="anonymous4" data-source="post: 1080391" data-attributes="member: 30532"><p>And just to point out again, the SCOTUS *should* always be on the pro-second amendment side, because the bill of rights is composed of UNALIENABLE rights, not inalienable rights (understand the difference, they do). This is to say the second amendment is an idea bestowed upon us as a natural right that cannot be taken away nor traded as an inalienable right could.</p><p></p><p>Justice Scalia is pro-gun (pro second amendment), please do not try to misunderstand what he was saying. For instance, in 1776 one could own a private cannon. You can right now. He is hinged on the "bear" aspect of the second amendment being hand-held. Just one example, however the anti-gun ran with his latest statement. Not accurate and is not real news.</p><p></p><p>Our founding fathers were visionaries. Expose your mind with the writing some of these men produced in all areas, including the right to bear arms. Their body of work is pretty extraordinary on the subject. The importance of citizenship armament parity with the military is a theme found throughout. One of the favorites amongst the anti-gunners is "well they had muskets back then not assault rifles". Indulge yourself in their writings. One of my favorites being Thomas Jefferson. A scientist and true visionary.</p><p></p><p>"A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves...and include all men capable of bearing arms." - Richard Henry Lee (Letters from the federalist farmers)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="anonymous4, post: 1080391, member: 30532"] And just to point out again, the SCOTUS *should* always be on the pro-second amendment side, because the bill of rights is composed of UNALIENABLE rights, not inalienable rights (understand the difference, they do). This is to say the second amendment is an idea bestowed upon us as a natural right that cannot be taken away nor traded as an inalienable right could. Justice Scalia is pro-gun (pro second amendment), please do not try to misunderstand what he was saying. For instance, in 1776 one could own a private cannon. You can right now. He is hinged on the "bear" aspect of the second amendment being hand-held. Just one example, however the anti-gun ran with his latest statement. Not accurate and is not real news. Our founding fathers were visionaries. Expose your mind with the writing some of these men produced in all areas, including the right to bear arms. Their body of work is pretty extraordinary on the subject. The importance of citizenship armament parity with the military is a theme found throughout. One of the favorites amongst the anti-gunners is "well they had muskets back then not assault rifles". Indulge yourself in their writings. One of my favorites being Thomas Jefferson. A scientist and true visionary. "A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves...and include all men capable of bearing arms." - Richard Henry Lee (Letters from the federalist farmers) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
Life After Brown
ruger gun support
Top