Sarah Palin--Disagree must you Destroy ?

tieguy

Banned
BABAGANOUSH,



At the TEA PARTIES, FOX news purchased thousands of Glen Becks new book only to hand them out at rallys...
LOL:peaceful:

you got proof on that my friend from the back side?

I don't know if Palin is strong enough to get elected but I think she is capturing some of what Obama captured. People want energy and change and now that Obama has proven to be status quo she may be the one that energizes voters.
Whatever happens its clear that a lot people are not holding grudges for her hideous VP campaign.
 

island1fox

Well-Known Member
Lets not go here.
I am a man. I have no business commenting on these manners.
Even if you're not bible-thumping, you're still not fully accepting that it's not your decision to make for others.
Diesel,
Typical Liberal response ---I am not a "Bible Thumper" But You May believe you have no business talking and discussing Abortion . Man or Woman ---we should never be afraid to discuss what is legislated.
Abortion is a real subject. Hey lets not go there man --lets pretend it does not exist. :sad-little:


Had Hilliary won the nomination from Obama, she would have cleaned McCain's and Palin's clock for the Presidencey even more so. She would have had the votes of the working class racial stiffs in the south, the bible belt, the rural mid-west and the appalachians as well....
Palin couldn't hold Hillary's girdle on the issues. Don't you feel there are smarter, well rounded, stronge conservative women in your party, who can fill the bill in 2012, or is it all outside dexterity and phyisicality to sex deprived republicans....lol:peaceful:
 

island1fox

Well-Known Member
D,
I don't disagree with what you are saying but I do think men have a say in this but it may not be in the way we might think. Because had we thought to begin with, think as men should, maybe that woman would not have been put into a position to begin with to have to choose between abortion or not.

As a man, I say we are very much at the root of the problem and if we acted like men in the first place, abortion on it's own would be a non issue if at all. IMO we can't drop in, satisfy ourselves and then stand from afar with a "not my problem" pious attitude. Fact is we (men) helped create this scenario and the only thing we debate is whether or not we have a right to tell a woman what to do with a problem we help create? How many women gave in just to shut us up and get rid of the mental torture we put them through to give it up? When will we step up and claim our own fault in causing abortions to even take place to begin with?

If men want to stop all abortions, then look in a mirror for the first step in the solution!

BTW D: I'm not preaching at you (your point well made) but just speaking out to all us males that it's long past time we stop and looked in the mirror. It's way past time that ethics and moral actions return to men and loads of problems we face would start to disappear IMO.

Self Gov't begins with SELF!

jmo


Wkmac,
Many of the points in your post I believe are very valid. I cannot agree with you and Diesel that because we are "men" we cannot discuss and shed light on a very controversional and "third rail" current issue of today.
The points in your post ---that I see very clearly --many men will have their "fun" --walk away and leave the problem with the woman.
This can lead to Abortion ---or another thing the Liberals seem to glorify --single mother families. One of the major problems in Black communities is the fact that 7 out of ten children are born to single Moms. this leads to poverty, crime and prison for many Black Men -a vicious circle.
Men are part of the problem and should be part of the solution.
Also from another view ---How about the man --that desperately wants to have his child born --will raise it without any help or contact from the Mom ---but the present law tells him it is NONE of HIS business ????:dissapointed:
 

brett636

Well-Known Member
So it looks like Obama's political arm has sent a fundraising e-mail out to help raise $500k to help fight Sarah Palin, and Martha Stewart has called Palin a "dangerous person". Makes me like her even more as the liberals show how frightened they are of her. Why so much fear for someone you all love to say is going nowhere on the political scene?

[video=youtube;Ypo1sI_dmso]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ypo1sI_dmso[/video]

President Obama's political arm, Organizing for America, has sent a fundraising e-mail seeking to raise $500,000 in the next week to stop a "dangerous" Palin from derailing the Democrats' effort to overhaul health care.

The email directs readers to a page on the BarackObama.com Web site, where they can choose to donate an amount ranging from five dollars to $1,000.
 

tieguy

Banned
'
Had Hilliary won the nomination from Obama, she would have cleaned McCain's and Palin's clock for the Presidencey even more so. She would have had the votes of the working class racial stiffs in the south, the bible belt, the rural mid-west and the appalachians as well....
Palin couldn't hold Hillary's girdle on the issues. Don't you feel there are smarter, well rounded, stronge conservative women in your party, who can fill the bill in 2012, or is it all outside dexterity and phyisicality to sex deprived republicans....lol:peaceful:

Hillary would not have gotten the minority vote that Obama got. Hillary has some serious likability issues. Hillary would not have cleaned anyones clock and could have easily lost to McCain.

Other then jerking your chain I'm not supporting Palin for anything yet. But at the same time despite your best efforts to destroy her and her family the fact remains that Palin is no dumber and no less qualified then the great one was at this point.

The thing that should scare you is that Palin is gathering a rock star type reception wherever she is going. People want change from politics as usual and Obama did not deliver that change as promised. Unless you think his focus meetings with Chinease college students while the economy is tanked is good change.

I'm really enjoying this. The liberals took their anti-palin smear campaign to new lows. They thought they had Palin squashed. But there she is traipsing across the country flashing that pretty smile to thousands of excited and energized voters.

Whats next from the liberals in phase two of the smear her and her family campaign?:knockedout:
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
Martha is quick to describe Palin as "dangerous" while admitting she has not seen a Palin interview. Typical liberal following the party line.
Do you really want Palin nominated in 2012? If so, I am happy to say that you and I have never agreed more:happy-very:.
 

island1fox

Well-Known Member
Do you really want Palin nominated in 2012? If so, I am happy to say that you and I have never agreed more:happy-very:.

bbsam,

Many said that also before our first Black President was elected --and I mean Republican's. They felt He would never be elected but would prevent Hillary from becoming President. They were only half right.
Be careful what you "wish " for if you are on the "left":wink2:
The time was right for Obama --A Perfect Storm---with all the spending and liberal programs being unleashed --the Economy will never recover --the Tax burden on all business --particularly small and midsize will only continue to shrink the economy.
With rampant unemployment ----anyone who gets nominated by the "right" will be in position to take advantage of another "Perfect Storm"
 
Last edited:

brett636

Well-Known Member
Do you really want Palin nominated in 2012? If so, I am happy to say that you and I have never agreed more:happy-very:.

Just remember that females make up just over 50% of the total votes cast, and if you add in the conservative vote (more people identify themselves as conservatives than liberals) you have the perfect recipe for the first woman President in 2012! :D
 

diesel96

Well-Known Member
The problem here is there is no such thing as Palestinian land. In fact, the Palestinians didn't start bitching about not having a homeland until Israel existed. Funny enough they want all the land Israel sits on. Strange huh?

Brett, if you want us to believe your an expert in history as well, you got to try harder. The land has been in turmoil and ruled by various empires thrughout history. Latest land barons were the British who had originally promised the land to their Arab allies who helped defeat the Ottoman empire, afterwards, the British also committed the same land to persecuted Jewish settlers as well. The British, stuck between a rock and a hard place, decided to partition the country..With the success of the state of Israel, and their military dominance, they took it amongst themselves, against Geneva accords, to ilegally expand, and have not stopped since. Which compounds the problems of the Middle East.
Or, as some of you like to say, the land belongs to Israel, because God said so. He spoke to told Abraham over 2000 years ago....so it must be true...
BTW Palestinians and Jews are genetically closer to each other than either is to the Arabs of Arabia or to Europeans of Europe.


It's way past time that ethics and moral actions return to men and loads of problems we face would start to disappear IMO.

Self Gov't begins with SELF!

jmo

Point taken, ethics ands moral action should return to men and his loads should be dropped in little latex bags....:smart: Go USC....:wink2:


I'm not voting for Pailin (if she runs) but, I've never seen liberal Dems. attack anyone so vigorously as they have attaked Sarah Pailin....they must be very afraid.

Used to be that someone's kids were off limits, but the liberal press kept gnawing away like wolves with a carcass. Shameful!!:dissapointed:

More, the GOP braintrust put VP candidate Palin out on a pedalstal knowing she would get buried on the issues. She opened a can of worms accusing Obama of "Paling around with Terrorist", being a socialist, and many other un-truths, while pretending she's living the moral high ground while the banjos of deliverance are playing in Alaska within her own family. Lets not pretend there's not a double standard here. Obama's and his family has been visciously attack as well, not to mention a TV News Network is in the tank with rt wing factions with seeing the current President fails.

So it looks like Obama's political arm has sent a fundraising e-mail out to help raise $500k to help fight Sarah Palin, and Martha Stewart has called Palin a "dangerous person". Makes me like her even more as the liberals show how frightened they are of her. Why so much fear for someone you all love to say is going nowhere on the political scene?

YouTube- Martha Stewart Calls Sarah Palin A "Dangerous Person"

I rec'v e-mails and mailing's from the Obama camp. Not one of them has Sarah Palin's name on it or has been concern with her. Let you in on a little secret, Obama's people have been continually sending out E-mails for donations before and after day one of his presidency. Nothing new there buddy, so keep trying, someone out there's bound to buy your spin....Martha called Palin dangerous knowing one of her beligerent followers are liable to do something stupid and cause harm to others.....

Martha Stewart (an ex-con) doesn't have room to talk.....Beeatch !!!

But Martha Stewart has the Capital to say what ever she wants. And people listen....In fact Martha has better command of the issues than Sarah....lol

Typical Liberal response ---I am not a "Bible Thumper" But You May believe you have no business talking and discussing Abortion . Man or Woman ---we should never be afraid to discuss what is legislated.
Abortion is a real subject. Hey lets not go there man --lets pretend it does not exist. :sad-little:

Typical ex-Republican that calls himself an Independent reponse---putting words into one's mouth as usual .....no one's pretending it does not exist, however this is not the thread to debate it. Their are other threads with topics of abortion which I aviod cause there's no reasoning with anti-choicers.....They still can't get passed calling embryos and fetuses inside the Mothers's womb, children....
 

diesel96

Well-Known Member
Just remember that females make up just over 50% of the total votes cast, and if you add in the conservative vote (more people identify themselves as conservatives than liberals) you have the perfect recipe for the first woman President in 2012! :D

Lets pretend your fantasy comes true. She still has to participate in debates and answer tough questions on her own. That means she'll have to venture outside the realm of Fox News softball size questions....that will surly be her demise.....
 

brett636

Well-Known Member
Lets pretend your fantasy comes true. She still has to participate in debates and answer tough questions on her own. That means she'll have to venture outside the realm of Fox News softball size questions....that will surly be her demise.....

When she isn't worried about having to play 2nd string to an already poor presidential candidate then you will see that those tough questions will come with straight answers. The McCain camp really struggled with the fact the country was more interested in Sarah Palin than John McCain. Last I heard she has more followers on facebook and twitter than the white house has. 2012 is a long way off, but the prospects of this current failure of a President getting thrown out is looking better and better. Getting Sarah in there would be the icing on the cake.
 

tieguy

Banned
But Martha Stewart has the Capital to say what ever she wants. And people listen....In fact Martha has better command of the issues than Sarah....lol

A slight rephrasing might be she has the money to sound stupid on this issue. Pretty stupid to call Palin dangerous and then admit she had not heard any palin interviews. ROFLMAO

Typical ex-Republican that calls himself an Independent reponse---putting words into one's mouth as usual .....no one's pretending it does not exist, however this is not the thread to debate it. Their are other threads with topics of abortion which I aviod cause there's no reasoning with anti-choicers.....They still can't get passed calling embryos and fetuses inside the Mothers's womb, children....

Rumor has it you were a fetus one time. :surprised:
 
Last edited:

brett636

Well-Known Member
Brett, if you want us to believe your an expert in history as well, you got to try harder. The land has been in turmoil and ruled by various empires thrughout history. Latest land barons were the British who had originally promised the land to their Arab allies who helped defeat the Ottoman empire, afterwards, the British also committed the same land to persecuted Jewish settlers as well. The British, stuck between a rock and a hard place, decided to partition the country..With the success of the state of Israel, and their military dominance, they took it amongst themselves, against Geneva accords, to ilegally expand, and have not stopped since. Which compounds the problems of the Middle East.
Or, as some of you like to say, the land belongs to Israel, because God said so. He spoke to told Abraham over 2000 years ago....so it must be true...
BTW Palestinians and Jews are genetically closer to each other than either is to the Arabs of Arabia or to Europeans of Europe.

What you stated is not quite true, but little of what you state ever is.

[video=youtube;lS2ZVrnnO1w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lS2ZVrnnO1w[/video]







I rec'v e-mails and mailing's from the Obama camp. Not one of them has Sarah Palin's name on it or has been concern with her. Let you in on a little secret, Obama's people have been continually sending out E-mails for donations before and after day one of his presidency. Nothing new there buddy, so keep trying, someone out there's bound to buy your spin....Martha called Palin dangerous knowing one of her beligerent followers are liable to do something stupid and cause harm to others.....
Based on your inability to understand the basic forum text formatting tags I doubt you could even begin to comprehend how a database works. I highly doubt every campaign communication will get sent to everybody all the time considering they are not always meant for everyone. Just because you receive such e-mails does not mean they are all sent your way.



But Martha Stewart has the Capital to say what ever she wants. And people listen....In fact Martha has better command of the issues than Sarah....lol
Last I checked Martha stewart is a convicted criminal because of her lies she told the SEC. Certainly not someone I would want to put on a pedestal above Sarah Palin when it comes to having a grasp of the issues. Especially how she states that she has never watched Sarah Palin.
 

tieguy

Banned
Lets pretend your fantasy comes true. She still has to participate in debates and answer tough questions on her own. That means she'll have to venture outside the realm of Fox News softball size questions....that will surly be her demise.....

Following your logic Obama was born with all the answers?

I'm sure Obama was taught just like Palin can be taught just like every other presidential candidate can be taught. I hope the rest of the liberals share your feelings makes 2012 much easier.
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
Lets pretend your fantasy comes true. She still has to participate in debates and answer tough questions on her own. That means she'll have to venture outside the realm of Fox News softball size questions....that will surly be her demise.....

Questions for her debate with BHO;
I have my long form birth certificate let's see yours ?
Just why are all your personal records unavailable ?
Who was Renee L Abena Obama ? {http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=5259}
I wrote my book , who wrote your book ?
Just how many of your Team Obama members are tax cheats ?
You offered change yet hired everyone from Bill Clinton's team, care to fully explain that ?
How much longer are you going to blame everything on George Bush ?
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
Questions for her debate with BHO;
I have my long form birth certificate let's see yours ?
Just why are all your personal records unavailable ?
Who was Renee L Abena Obama ? {http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=5259}
I wrote my book , who wrote your book ?
Just how many of your Team Obama members are tax cheats ?
You offered change yet hired everyone from Bill Clinton's team, care to fully explain that ?
How much longer are you going to blame everything on George Bush ?

Youre jumping the gun abit dont cha think BABA? Currently, PALIN only polls about 15% of republicans among ALL the potential candidates.

Its a long way before she ever gets to a debate. She will have to fight off all the other qualified republicans first.

You and tie should take those boeners for Palin and start a sword fighting club! Otherwise, its just a waste of a good stiffy.

As for your questions, Do you think ( and i doubt you do) that those questions will have been beaten to the ground by october 2012??

You dont actually think anyone will want to hear about rev wright, bill ayers, birth certificates, etc etc by October 2012 do you? Oh wait, thats your life's work, so yes I guess there will be one person.

4 years is a long way off from now. The country will have pulled out of a recession by then, the gdp will have grown each quarter by 3% since this quarter, the banking industry will have fully recovered, the housing market will have stabilized, we will have pulled out of IRAQ and Afghanistan, unemployment will be down and the country will be better off than when BUSH and the republicans doomed the country from 2000 to 2008.

Now, how exactly will the republicans be able to win the White House??

Im listening...:why:
 
Top