Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Sarah Palin--Disagree must you Destroy ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 639478" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>I watched the YouTube video linked and very quick in I found a serious historical flaw presented as fact. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Direct quote from the New Jewish Encyclopedia copyright 62' 76' under the article Palestine. And before I quote let me point out that why would you have an article on something if it never existed in the first place?</p><p> </p><p> page 369 under the article Palestine</p><p> </p><p>It goes on to say this as well in the same article.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Throughout the entire article the text repeats the term Palestine over and over again with such phrases as:</p><p>Palestine is situated in the southwestern corner of Asia</p><p>Palestine covers 66k kilometers</p><p>Palestine contains 4 zones</p><p>Jewish history in Palestine began in about 2k BCE</p><p>The Syrian and Egyptian dynasties battled over Palestine</p><p>170 BCE Palestine conquered by Syrians</p><p>Palestine remained under Roman and Byzantine rule</p><p> </p><p>So for a land of Palestine to have never existed seems a bit of a problem to say the least. Don't keep a copy of the New Jewish Encyclopedia on your bookshelf? A good student of history would! <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink2:" title="Wink :wink2:" data-shortname=":wink2:" /> I also guess it doesn't matter that the whole idea of a jewish homeland wasn't an issue until in the late 19th century when a french jew by the name of Theodore Herzl witnessed an anti-jewish event in France and then started what became known as the Zionist movement. I guess also it would matter if the early Zionist Congress voted on a Jewish State in Africa after land in Uganda was offered? Funny also that it was about this same time that the Dispensational Pre-Millennialism (a belief very centered on God establishing a nationstate for Israel in the end times) took strong root in protestant Christianity in Europe and America.</p><p> </p><p>I've spoken before of the teachings of jew and arab being brothers and both sides accepting this as fact but for your sake, here's under the heading of Arabs, New Jewish Encyclopedia, page 18.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>If you know your Sunday School lessons, remember Ishmael and Hagar as opposed to Sarah and Issac? And what is the first law of family succession of property and name? To the first born and who was the first born in this case? Even Jacob who's name was changed to Israel was not the firstborn and only achieved the birthright through deception and trickery. But then all this claim to a land is all predicated on a religious document that grants special privedge and rights to a certain people and whom from them the bible came into existence. Do we ever dare question a man made document that truth be told had more to do with a political/social motive than knowing all truth about God? But yet we sit here and see no problem nor conflict in the fact that the people who claim the divine conduit of God to us also have for themselves a very specific and special place of which no one is to ever question or ever doubt. And the only proof is their word based on our faith?</p><p> </p><p>The claim to land ownership by both sides is rooted in a system of religous dogma written by the hand of men (way after the fact) and not divinely inspired by the spoken word of god. As I've said before, this is a family fight and we should stay out of it completely as we have no business in it.</p><p> </p><p>Also Brett, as you stated to D' comments about being untrue, you might spend some time reading up on the Sykes-Picot Agreement and the Balfour Declaration. As to Sykes and the <strong><u>broken</u></strong> promises to Arabs, the british told the arab tribes if they fought with them against the Ottoman Turk's, the British after the war would grant them and their lands full soverign independence and yet if was Lord Balfour himself from the post war Paris talks that stated all promises to arabs would not be honored and then Arabia was made a british protectorate. Even today, the royal Saudia family is a puppet gov't of the west who only grow rich and care little about anyone else.</p><p> </p><p>Between broken promises and locked kneed stances of denying historical fact that Palestine existed, I see no reason where the arab should trust us.</p><p> </p><p>And we wonder why the arab peoples hate us so!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 639478, member: 2189"] I watched the YouTube video linked and very quick in I found a serious historical flaw presented as fact. Direct quote from the New Jewish Encyclopedia copyright 62' 76' under the article Palestine. And before I quote let me point out that why would you have an article on something if it never existed in the first place? page 369 under the article Palestine It goes on to say this as well in the same article. Throughout the entire article the text repeats the term Palestine over and over again with such phrases as: Palestine is situated in the southwestern corner of Asia Palestine covers 66k kilometers Palestine contains 4 zones Jewish history in Palestine began in about 2k BCE The Syrian and Egyptian dynasties battled over Palestine 170 BCE Palestine conquered by Syrians Palestine remained under Roman and Byzantine rule So for a land of Palestine to have never existed seems a bit of a problem to say the least. Don't keep a copy of the New Jewish Encyclopedia on your bookshelf? A good student of history would! :wink2: I also guess it doesn't matter that the whole idea of a jewish homeland wasn't an issue until in the late 19th century when a french jew by the name of Theodore Herzl witnessed an anti-jewish event in France and then started what became known as the Zionist movement. I guess also it would matter if the early Zionist Congress voted on a Jewish State in Africa after land in Uganda was offered? Funny also that it was about this same time that the Dispensational Pre-Millennialism (a belief very centered on God establishing a nationstate for Israel in the end times) took strong root in protestant Christianity in Europe and America. I've spoken before of the teachings of jew and arab being brothers and both sides accepting this as fact but for your sake, here's under the heading of Arabs, New Jewish Encyclopedia, page 18. If you know your Sunday School lessons, remember Ishmael and Hagar as opposed to Sarah and Issac? And what is the first law of family succession of property and name? To the first born and who was the first born in this case? Even Jacob who's name was changed to Israel was not the firstborn and only achieved the birthright through deception and trickery. But then all this claim to a land is all predicated on a religious document that grants special privedge and rights to a certain people and whom from them the bible came into existence. Do we ever dare question a man made document that truth be told had more to do with a political/social motive than knowing all truth about God? But yet we sit here and see no problem nor conflict in the fact that the people who claim the divine conduit of God to us also have for themselves a very specific and special place of which no one is to ever question or ever doubt. And the only proof is their word based on our faith? The claim to land ownership by both sides is rooted in a system of religous dogma written by the hand of men (way after the fact) and not divinely inspired by the spoken word of god. As I've said before, this is a family fight and we should stay out of it completely as we have no business in it. Also Brett, as you stated to D' comments about being untrue, you might spend some time reading up on the Sykes-Picot Agreement and the Balfour Declaration. As to Sykes and the [B][U]broken[/U][/B] promises to Arabs, the british told the arab tribes if they fought with them against the Ottoman Turk's, the British after the war would grant them and their lands full soverign independence and yet if was Lord Balfour himself from the post war Paris talks that stated all promises to arabs would not be honored and then Arabia was made a british protectorate. Even today, the royal Saudia family is a puppet gov't of the west who only grow rich and care little about anyone else. Between broken promises and locked kneed stances of denying historical fact that Palestine existed, I see no reason where the arab should trust us. And we wonder why the arab peoples hate us so! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Sarah Palin--Disagree must you Destroy ?
Top