Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Signs of backward progression
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="beentheredonethat" data-source="post: 539872" data-attributes="member: 4886"><p>Danny, good to have you back posting. </p><p>Although anything is possible, it's pretty rare that we will roll back the service for air. To do a downgrade, first the district IE and BD have to approve it, then it has to go to region ie\bd to approve and then to corp. All that has to happen is have one person veto it and it doesn't get done. </p><p>The only times I've seen a downgrade successfully implemented is when the downgrade will result in our going down to FDX svc commit or still being ahead of FDX svc commit. If the request brings us lower the FDX, 99.9% chance it won't be done. Second there has to be very little NDA volume in jeopardy to lose. Usually it's very small volume that only occasionally occurs and really screws up the dispatch when it does where it costs a decent amt of time for a FSP, or a need of a PTer. Let me know if it occurs, but odds are seriously against it. </p><p></p><p>I was involved in the district IE a long time ago and we put in a request to alter the svc commits. The district operations asked for virtually no upgrades and hundreds of downgrades. The district BD group asked for no downgrades and hudreds of upgrades. We came to a decision to go for about 100 upgrades and about 10 zips to be downgraded. So at the district level only a handful of downgrades made it past us. The region added a few more upgrades to us, and took away 1/2 the downgrades. When Corp got the request, they nixed the remaining downgrades and approved all the upgrades. </p><p></p><p>The next year, we finally pushed thru about 1/2 our initial request for downgrades. So it's unlikely it will occur.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="beentheredonethat, post: 539872, member: 4886"] Danny, good to have you back posting. Although anything is possible, it's pretty rare that we will roll back the service for air. To do a downgrade, first the district IE and BD have to approve it, then it has to go to region ie\bd to approve and then to corp. All that has to happen is have one person veto it and it doesn't get done. The only times I've seen a downgrade successfully implemented is when the downgrade will result in our going down to FDX svc commit or still being ahead of FDX svc commit. If the request brings us lower the FDX, 99.9% chance it won't be done. Second there has to be very little NDA volume in jeopardy to lose. Usually it's very small volume that only occasionally occurs and really screws up the dispatch when it does where it costs a decent amt of time for a FSP, or a need of a PTer. Let me know if it occurs, but odds are seriously against it. I was involved in the district IE a long time ago and we put in a request to alter the svc commits. The district operations asked for virtually no upgrades and hundreds of downgrades. The district BD group asked for no downgrades and hudreds of upgrades. We came to a decision to go for about 100 upgrades and about 10 zips to be downgraded. So at the district level only a handful of downgrades made it past us. The region added a few more upgrades to us, and took away 1/2 the downgrades. When Corp got the request, they nixed the remaining downgrades and approved all the upgrades. The next year, we finally pushed thru about 1/2 our initial request for downgrades. So it's unlikely it will occur. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Signs of backward progression
Top