Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
stolen parcels
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="browniehound" data-source="post: 480854" data-attributes="member: 4653"><p>I can smell him too. Its probably a troll, but here is my opinion on the subject regardless of where it came from.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>As for the SDN and being fired, he should only be fired if he actually signed the DIAD himself. If the customer left a SDN and the DIAD allows you (will it for sig. req. packages? I think it might, but I don't remember ever being stupid enough to try it) to hit SDN and then clarify the name by typing it in the space provided, then I don't see anything dishonest about this.</p><p> </p><p>If he has the note and hit SDN and the DIAD allowed him to clarify the name and he didn't sign the customer's name on the DIAD, what is dishonest about that?</p><p> </p><p>If this is the case he shouldn't be fired or made to pay for the package. Its UPS' DIAD and if they allow the device a SDN on sig. req. packages, then I think the liability lies with the company.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="browniehound, post: 480854, member: 4653"] I can smell him too. Its probably a troll, but here is my opinion on the subject regardless of where it came from. As for the SDN and being fired, he should only be fired if he actually signed the DIAD himself. If the customer left a SDN and the DIAD allows you (will it for sig. req. packages? I think it might, but I don't remember ever being stupid enough to try it) to hit SDN and then clarify the name by typing it in the space provided, then I don't see anything dishonest about this. If he has the note and hit SDN and the DIAD allowed him to clarify the name and he didn't sign the customer's name on the DIAD, what is dishonest about that? If this is the case he shouldn't be fired or made to pay for the package. Its UPS' DIAD and if they allow the device a SDN on sig. req. packages, then I think the liability lies with the company. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
stolen parcels
Top