Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
telematicks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 807881" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>In this hypothetical example, its <strong>not</strong> the Telematics data that will get the driver fired for dishonesty...<em>its what he says to his management team when he is questioned</em> versus what they are able to prove with their <strong>investigation</strong> that will get him fired for dishonesty.</p><p> </p><p>If he told them the truth..."I sheeted them as NI1 because I needed to get off of work early"....then he has committed a rather serious methods violation. It becomes dishonesty when he <em>lies</em> about it. And the ultimate <em>proof</em> of that lie cannot be solely based upon Telematics/GPS data. In this example, in order to make the case for termination airtight, the <strong>investigation</strong> performed by the management team would include going to the actual addresses in question and getting statements from the customers as to whether or not the driver ever actually made a delivery attempt. The Telematics data <em>by itself</em>, uncorraborated by any other statements or evidence, is <em>not</em> sufficent proof.</p><p> </p><p>I must also point out that your hypothetical example is not somethiing that any <em>ethical</em> driver would ever need to be concerned about. A driver who would "smoke" packages and falsify records in the manner you describe <em>deserves</em> to get fired for dishonesty.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 807881, member: 14668"] In this hypothetical example, its [B]not[/B] the Telematics data that will get the driver fired for dishonesty...[I]its what he says to his management team when he is questioned[/I] versus what they are able to prove with their [B]investigation[/B] that will get him fired for dishonesty. If he told them the truth..."I sheeted them as NI1 because I needed to get off of work early"....then he has committed a rather serious methods violation. It becomes dishonesty when he [I]lies[/I] about it. And the ultimate [I]proof[/I] of that lie cannot be solely based upon Telematics/GPS data. In this example, in order to make the case for termination airtight, the [B]investigation[/B] performed by the management team would include going to the actual addresses in question and getting statements from the customers as to whether or not the driver ever actually made a delivery attempt. The Telematics data [I]by itself[/I], uncorraborated by any other statements or evidence, is [I]not[/I] sufficent proof. I must also point out that your hypothetical example is not somethiing that any [I]ethical[/I] driver would ever need to be concerned about. A driver who would "smoke" packages and falsify records in the manner you describe [I]deserves[/I] to get fired for dishonesty. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
telematicks
Top