Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Terminated For Gross Negligence
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dannyboy" data-source="post: 307035" data-attributes="member: 484"><p>But Kene, re-read his posts. He is very articulate about him not seeing the cyclist, therefor it is not his fault. He is also very good at comunicating that he wants to get even with UPS, and how mean and cruel they are to him, and how bad the teamsters are for not representing him at the hearings. </p><p> </p><p>But yet with all those posts, all of which are designed to make him look good, why are there no posts that have any sort of proof of inocence? No dates given for the accident, no names of the victim, no posting of any paperwork showing what he is claiming. Now why would that be, if as you say, he is that backward when it comes to comunicating here on this site.</p><p> </p><p>Nope, its not that he cant, or does not have the ability, its that he has refused. And for good reason. He just plainly did not see that cycle, when he should have. He went through a blinking red light, in spite of the fact there was traffic coming down the other street. And instead of waiting, he pulled out in front of traffic. I dont doubt that he did not see the cycle. But I do doubt that he is inocent as claimed. And that the police report said he is not at fault.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>But I am trying to trace down what happened. It might take me a while, but I will find out the truth, in spite of what he has posted.</p><p> </p><p>d</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dannyboy, post: 307035, member: 484"] But Kene, re-read his posts. He is very articulate about him not seeing the cyclist, therefor it is not his fault. He is also very good at comunicating that he wants to get even with UPS, and how mean and cruel they are to him, and how bad the teamsters are for not representing him at the hearings. But yet with all those posts, all of which are designed to make him look good, why are there no posts that have any sort of proof of inocence? No dates given for the accident, no names of the victim, no posting of any paperwork showing what he is claiming. Now why would that be, if as you say, he is that backward when it comes to comunicating here on this site. Nope, its not that he cant, or does not have the ability, its that he has refused. And for good reason. He just plainly did not see that cycle, when he should have. He went through a blinking red light, in spite of the fact there was traffic coming down the other street. And instead of waiting, he pulled out in front of traffic. I dont doubt that he did not see the cycle. But I do doubt that he is inocent as claimed. And that the police report said he is not at fault. But I am trying to trace down what happened. It might take me a while, but I will find out the truth, in spite of what he has posted. d [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Terminated For Gross Negligence
Top