Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
UPS Subsidiaries
UPS Airline / Gateway
The FAA is dropping the ball
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="unionman" data-source="post: 683175" data-attributes="member: 21107"><p>There's a cop on this beat, but the evidence suggests the Federal Aviation Administration has sometimes worried more about inconveniencing airlines than about aggressively safeguarding passengers. <a href="http://rocnow.com/article/local-news/20102030338" target="_blank">During a hearing Tuesday</a> on last year's regional carrier crash near Buffalo that killed 50 people, the National Transportation Safety Board criticized the FAA for repeatedly ignoring safety recommendations and for not cracking down hard enough on regional carriers to make sure pilots are up to the job.</p><p>Not that the major airlines are blameless. <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2010-02-02-1Aairmaintenance02_CV_N.htm" target="_blank">An investigation by USA TODAY's Gary Stoller</a> showed that airlines, including the majors, flew at least 65,000 flights over the past six years when maintenance deficiencies should have kept those planes grounded. Are the airlines cutting corners to save a buck, or are they just too sloppy to ensure work is done properly? Either answer is a bad one.</p><p></p><p>The FAA eventually caught up with violators <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2010-02-02-airmaintenance02_VA_N.htm" target="_blank">and fined them</a>. But that's hardly reassuring. The agency punishes only the violations it manages to find out about, and even when that happens, a lot of potentially risky trips can occur before it acts. Southwest flew more than 60,000 flights in 2006 and 2007 without doing mandatory inspections for fuselage cracks, a cause of past crashes. The FAA ultimately fined Southwest, but <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2008-03-09-safety_N.htm" target="_blank">only after agency whistle-blowers told Congress</a> that superiors were coddling the airline.</p><p>The Air Transport Association, the group that represents major U.S. airlines, defends their safety record — which has in fact been very good in recent years — and notes that there have been no maintenance-related passenger fatalities among its members since January 2000.</p><p>But there have been some hair-raising incidents related to shoddy maintenance, including a United 737 that returned to Denver in April 2008 after shutting down an engine with low oil pressure readings. An inspection showed that in place of two required protective caps, there were shop towels — shop towels! — covering openings on the engine.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><a href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2010/02/debate-on-aviation-our-view-does-airline-costcutting-endanger-passenger-safety.html" target="_blank">http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2010/02/debate-on-aviation-our-view-does-airline-costcutting-endanger-passenger-safety.html</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="unionman, post: 683175, member: 21107"] There's a cop on this beat, but the evidence suggests the Federal Aviation Administration has sometimes worried more about inconveniencing airlines than about aggressively safeguarding passengers. [URL="http://rocnow.com/article/local-news/20102030338"]During a hearing Tuesday[/URL] on last year's regional carrier crash near Buffalo that killed 50 people, the National Transportation Safety Board criticized the FAA for repeatedly ignoring safety recommendations and for not cracking down hard enough on regional carriers to make sure pilots are up to the job. Not that the major airlines are blameless. [URL="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2010-02-02-1Aairmaintenance02_CV_N.htm"]An investigation by USA TODAY's Gary Stoller[/URL] showed that airlines, including the majors, flew at least 65,000 flights over the past six years when maintenance deficiencies should have kept those planes grounded. Are the airlines cutting corners to save a buck, or are they just too sloppy to ensure work is done properly? Either answer is a bad one. The FAA eventually caught up with violators [URL="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2010-02-02-airmaintenance02_VA_N.htm"]and fined them[/URL]. But that's hardly reassuring. The agency punishes only the violations it manages to find out about, and even when that happens, a lot of potentially risky trips can occur before it acts. Southwest flew more than 60,000 flights in 2006 and 2007 without doing mandatory inspections for fuselage cracks, a cause of past crashes. The FAA ultimately fined Southwest, but [URL="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2008-03-09-safety_N.htm"]only after agency whistle-blowers told Congress[/URL] that superiors were coddling the airline. The Air Transport Association, the group that represents major U.S. airlines, defends their safety record — which has in fact been very good in recent years — and notes that there have been no maintenance-related passenger fatalities among its members since January 2000. But there have been some hair-raising incidents related to shoddy maintenance, including a United 737 that returned to Denver in April 2008 after shutting down an engine with low oil pressure readings. An inspection showed that in place of two required protective caps, there were shop towels — shop towels! — covering openings on the engine. [URL]http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2010/02/debate-on-aviation-our-view-does-airline-costcutting-endanger-passenger-safety.html[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
UPS Subsidiaries
UPS Airline / Gateway
The FAA is dropping the ball
Top