Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
The Straight Truth About the Bush Economy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 78479" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>Tie,</p><p>Be careful in reposting complete articles like the one from the New American, Hot Topics, Cold Truth because it is copyrighted and at the bottom of the article is the copyright warning.</p><p></p><p>I got no problem with the article I just don't want any of us to make an honest mistake and get Cheryl into a twist and I know you feel the same way. It would be nice if like you did to quote the entire piece but that's life in the big city. Here's a link to the entire article and just to make sure all is credited, the article was published in The New American magazine produced by American Opinion Publishing which is the publishing arm of the John Birch Society.</p><p></p><p>Here's the John Birch Society's policy.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20060207134014/http://www.jbs.org/artman/publish/article_394.shtml" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20060207134014/http://www.jbs.org/artman/publish/article_394.shtml</a></p><p></p><p>IMO, you are correct in that there is no real clear consensus on so-called global warming. Now on a personal level I happen to believe the smart thing to do is to error on the side of doing what I can in my personal life to limit my own use/creation, etc. of greenhouse gases (I eat less beans and rice<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/thumbup1.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":thumbup1:" title="Thumbup1 :thumbup1:" data-shortname=":thumbup1:" /> ) and if in some way I can go to zero emmissions, hey let's do it but not under the force of gov't. I know for us in my neck of the woods winter was suppose to be a bad one but it's been awesome except for the spring type storms with severe T-Storms and a couple of tornadoes. We will pay this summer as the bugs will drive us buggie! At the same time, my understanding is that northern Europe and Russia have gotten their butts kicked with some really extreme cold weather so that in itself challenges the term of Global Warming but under this name the idea will include events like warming in one region while another gets very cold and the next year it could reverse.</p><p></p><p>This science is a somewhat new science and their are some concerning indicators we should be keeping an eye on and considering alternatives but the use the force of gov't to mandate and then later like so many other things to learn we were wrong? I know being wrong goes both ways and you could ask which side to you error on but for me the gov't has such a history of being a big <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2 :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" /> up, I'm not willing to risk it at this point.</p><p></p><p>JMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 78479, member: 2189"] Tie, Be careful in reposting complete articles like the one from the New American, Hot Topics, Cold Truth because it is copyrighted and at the bottom of the article is the copyright warning. I got no problem with the article I just don't want any of us to make an honest mistake and get Cheryl into a twist and I know you feel the same way. It would be nice if like you did to quote the entire piece but that's life in the big city. Here's a link to the entire article and just to make sure all is credited, the article was published in The New American magazine produced by American Opinion Publishing which is the publishing arm of the John Birch Society. Here's the John Birch Society's policy. [url]https://web.archive.org/web/20060207134014/http://www.jbs.org/artman/publish/article_394.shtml[/url] IMO, you are correct in that there is no real clear consensus on so-called global warming. Now on a personal level I happen to believe the smart thing to do is to error on the side of doing what I can in my personal life to limit my own use/creation, etc. of greenhouse gases (I eat less beans and rice:thumbup1: ) and if in some way I can go to zero emmissions, hey let's do it but not under the force of gov't. I know for us in my neck of the woods winter was suppose to be a bad one but it's been awesome except for the spring type storms with severe T-Storms and a couple of tornadoes. We will pay this summer as the bugs will drive us buggie! At the same time, my understanding is that northern Europe and Russia have gotten their butts kicked with some really extreme cold weather so that in itself challenges the term of Global Warming but under this name the idea will include events like warming in one region while another gets very cold and the next year it could reverse. This science is a somewhat new science and their are some concerning indicators we should be keeping an eye on and considering alternatives but the use the force of gov't to mandate and then later like so many other things to learn we were wrong? I know being wrong goes both ways and you could ask which side to you error on but for me the gov't has such a history of being a big :censored: up, I'm not willing to risk it at this point. JMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
The Straight Truth About the Bush Economy
Top