Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Tom
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tieguy" data-source="post: 679990" data-attributes="member: 1912"><p>I don't think I'm wrong at all. </p><p> </p><p>The intent of the language was to protect pay scales.</p><p> </p><p>It was never meant to turn every union employee into a coniving litigator. </p><p> </p><p>But that is what you have created with it. </p><p> </p><p>Your people violate the contract every day by trying to find new ways to apply the same language. Many approachs go outside the original intent. </p><p> </p><p>you guys get tired of contract violations while I get tired of fishing expeditions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tieguy, post: 679990, member: 1912"] I don't think I'm wrong at all. The intent of the language was to protect pay scales. It was never meant to turn every union employee into a coniving litigator. But that is what you have created with it. Your people violate the contract every day by trying to find new ways to apply the same language. Many approachs go outside the original intent. you guys get tired of contract violations while I get tired of fishing expeditions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Tom
Top