Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
too many signatures a integrity issue ???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bubblehead" data-source="post: 723870" data-attributes="member: 14176"><p>I disagree.</p><p>I see it this way.</p><p>The only way it is a duplicate stop, is if you have an additional pkg for the office, and are going there anyway.</p><p>It is my contention, that at the first stop at an apt complex that is not in, and you have no other reason to go to the office, this stop is completed as not in, then re-recorded and placed in prerecord.</p><p>This rational is only valid at the first apt that is not in and there are no packages for the apt office.</p><p>Every subsequent stop that is not in, is also placed in prerecord and indirected to the office.</p><p>The trip to the office is an additional stop in this scenario and is so represented by using this method.</p><p>This is proven true by the fact that if all the consignees were in, I would not have had to go the office at all, making it an additional stop.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bubblehead, post: 723870, member: 14176"] I disagree. I see it this way. The only way it is a duplicate stop, is if you have an additional pkg for the office, and are going there anyway. It is my contention, that at the first stop at an apt complex that is not in, and you have no other reason to go to the office, this stop is completed as not in, then re-recorded and placed in prerecord. This rational is only valid at the first apt that is not in and there are no packages for the apt office. Every subsequent stop that is not in, is also placed in prerecord and indirected to the office. The trip to the office is an additional stop in this scenario and is so represented by using this method. This is proven true by the fact that if all the consignees were in, I would not have had to go the office at all, making it an additional stop. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
too many signatures a integrity issue ???
Top