Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Transfer-
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="959Nanook" data-source="post: 1372955" data-attributes="member: 14462"><p>Fine, if they can be ironed out so easily, you can start with the issues raised in this thread. This is an oversimplification that is naive and we have tried to explain why it is complicated. Your proposed "model" language is woefully inadequate for handling the complexities. Change of operations involve one BA's jurisdiction or is at least isolated to the same Local's jurisdiction in the majority of situations? When more than one Local is involved, they are almost always in the same Region or at least contiguous? The intended scope of the change in operations language and allowing nationwide transfers while maintaining original pensions are night and day. This involves EVERY single Rider and Supplement in the nation. </p><p></p><p>Have you ever wondered why transfers are only allowed within a Region as it is? What, if anything, has changed to make inter-regional transfers easier? Have you EVER heard IBT or even rank and file Teamsters asking for this enmasse? I will tell you why you will not hear rank and file Teamsters crying out for this... it threatens the institution of seniority. Speaking of seniority... how does the Teamster vest in the gaining Local?</p><p></p><p>Sent using BrownCafe App</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="959Nanook, post: 1372955, member: 14462"] Fine, if they can be ironed out so easily, you can start with the issues raised in this thread. This is an oversimplification that is naive and we have tried to explain why it is complicated. Your proposed "model" language is woefully inadequate for handling the complexities. Change of operations involve one BA's jurisdiction or is at least isolated to the same Local's jurisdiction in the majority of situations? When more than one Local is involved, they are almost always in the same Region or at least contiguous? The intended scope of the change in operations language and allowing nationwide transfers while maintaining original pensions are night and day. This involves EVERY single Rider and Supplement in the nation. Have you ever wondered why transfers are only allowed within a Region as it is? What, if anything, has changed to make inter-regional transfers easier? Have you EVER heard IBT or even rank and file Teamsters asking for this enmasse? I will tell you why you will not hear rank and file Teamsters crying out for this... it threatens the institution of seniority. Speaking of seniority... how does the Teamster vest in the gaining Local? Sent using BrownCafe App [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Transfer-
Top