Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Trouble brewing in chicago!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JonFrum" data-source="post: 469647" data-attributes="member: 18044"><p>Let's put the H&W issue aside just for a moment and consider the Local 705 Pension Language:</p><p></p><p> </p><p>THIS IS LANGUAGE UPS AGREED TO!!!</p><p> </p><p>It clearly spells out that a strike is the mutually accepted way to enforce delinquent pension payments. Now notice that 705red has said nothing about this. That's because UPS has not violated this particular clause. But if UPS chose to violate this clause sometime during the next five years, I'm sure Red would tell us about the situation. And rightly so. It all depends on UPS. Red is just the messenger. If UPS knowingly violates a clause that triggers a strike threat then they get a strike threat, (and possibly a strike.) If they don't violate such a clause, or choose to violate a different clause that doesn't carry a strike threat, then there will be no strike threat. Simple, huh? It's all up to UPS.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JonFrum, post: 469647, member: 18044"] Let's put the H&W issue aside just for a moment and consider the Local 705 Pension Language: THIS IS LANGUAGE UPS AGREED TO!!! It clearly spells out that a strike is the mutually accepted way to enforce delinquent pension payments. Now notice that 705red has said nothing about this. That's because UPS has not violated this particular clause. But if UPS chose to violate this clause sometime during the next five years, I'm sure Red would tell us about the situation. And rightly so. It all depends on UPS. Red is just the messenger. If UPS knowingly violates a clause that triggers a strike threat then they get a strike threat, (and possibly a strike.) If they don't violate such a clause, or choose to violate a different clause that doesn't carry a strike threat, then there will be no strike threat. Simple, huh? It's all up to UPS. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Trouble brewing in chicago!
Top