UPS Franchisees Appeal after Judge Decertifies Class

cheryl

I started this.
Staff member
UPS Franchisees Appeal after Judge Decertifies Class - Blue Maumau

The UPS Store / Mail Boxes Etc franchisees filed a notice of appeal last week while still licking their wounds from a devastating blow from a California court. The judge decertified their collective claims as a “class” group.

In the franchisees’ lawsuit against franchisor United Parcel Services, they claim The UPS Store business model presented to them after UPS took over in 2001 was flawed, causing irreparable harm to their stores.

Last month, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge William friend. Highberger granted summary judgment to the shipping giant, ruling that franchisees who owned Mail Boxes, Etc. stores that later converted to The UPS Store system, had not proven to the court that they were harmed by the conversion. A year ago, he had granted 3,500 MBE franchisees class-action status in the lawsuit.
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
Trials over for UPS in cases related to Mail Boxes Etc. purchase


By Arielle Kass

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
6:38 p.m. Friday, October 1, 2010

Barring any appeals, the trials related to UPS' acquisition of Mail Boxes Etc. came to an end this week for the Sandy Springs company with an order by a California judge.
The Sept. 27 order granting summary judgment to UPS and Mail Boxes Etc. rejected claims brought by Mail Boxes Etc. franchisees that the UPS Store's business model was flawed, UPS spokeswoman Susan Rosenberg said.
"The trial level is over," she said. "It was a victory for UPS."
Some cases are still working their way through the appellate process, but Rosenberg said three major lawsuits filed by various franchisees were all resolved in favor of UPS and Mail Boxes Etc.
This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court in 2003 by franchisees that operated Mail Boxes Etc. stores. UPS bought the chain in April 2001 for $190 million.
Denise Woodard, a representative for a class of nearly 3,000 plaintiffs, contended that the tests UPS used to determine whether the UPS Store would be a better business model for franchisees than the existing Mail Boxes Etc. centers were incomplete and inadequately conceived and implemented.
Also at issue in the case was the argument of 175 franchisees who did not convert their Mail Boxes Etc. stores to the UPS name immediately. They claimed the rebranding destroyed their business model, which was built around the Mail Boxes Etc. name.
Superior Court Judge William friend. Highberger, who first ruled in July, said in the order that the class "failed to carry their burden of providing evidence of damages."
An attorney for the class could not be reached for comment as to whether an appeal is planned.

 
Top